Cilt 11 Sayı 2 (2023): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Borsa, şirketlerin karbon azaltma davranışını yönlendirmeleri için yeterli teşvik sağlar mı?

PDF (English)
  • Shou-Lin Yang,
  • Yen-Hsun Chen,
  • Chung-Hsing Yeh,
  • Tsai-Chen Chang,
  • Tzu-Cin Shu
Shou-Lin Yang
Associate Professor, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (R.O.C.),
Yen-Hsun Chen
Associate Professor, Far East University, Tainan, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Chung-Hsing Yeh
Associate Professor, Far Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tsai-Chen Chang
Ph.D. Student, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tzu-Cin Shu
Associate Professor, Hubei Polytechnic University, Hubei, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v11i2.2198

Yayınlanmış 2023-06-26

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Carbon Reduction, Market Reaction, Event Study
  • Karbon Azaltma, Piyasa Tepkisi, Vaka Çalışması

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Yang, S.-L., Chen, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H., Chang, T.-C., & Shu, T.-C. (2023). Borsa, şirketlerin karbon azaltma davranışını yönlendirmeleri için yeterli teşvik sağlar mı?. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(2), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v11i2.2198

Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Shou-Lin Yang- Yen-Hsun Chen- Chung-Hsing Yeh- Tsai-Chen Chang- Tzu-Cin Shu

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Özet

Bu çalışma, şirketlerin 2000'den 2018'e kadar Doğu Asya'da atık su ve atık ısı geri kazanım sistemleri kurduklarını duyurmasının ardından hisse senedi fiyatlarının anormal getirilerini gözlemliyor. Atık su ve atık ısı geri kazanım sistemine yapılan sermaye harcaması ve gelir üzerinde beklenen etki de dikkate alınıyor ve Şirket bu tür bir karbon emisyonu azaltım faaliyeti gerçekleştirdikten sonra ek bir değerlendirme olup olmadığını doğrulamak için borsa analiz edilir. Çalışma, on yılı aşkın bir süredir teknolojik ilerleme ve karbon azaltma davranışlarını teşvik ettikten sonra, pazarın atık su ve atık ısı geri kazanım sistemleri gibi karbon azaltma önlemlerine daha olumlu tepkiler gösterdiğini ortaya koyuyor. Ancak, gelişmekte olan ülke piyasalarındaki ek olumlu tepki, gelişmiş ülkelere göre daha düşük. Yerli üreticilerin daha fazla karbon emisyonu azaltma faaliyeti benimsemesini isteyen gelişmekte olan ülkeler için, hükümetin daha fazla politika teşviki sunması gerekebilir; bu, piyasadaki yatırımcıları, üreticileri aktif olarak karbon azaltma önlemlerine yatırım yapma konusunda desteklemeye teşvik edecektir. Elbette, üreticiler gönüllü karbon azaltma önlemlerini uygulamak veya bunlarla işbirliği yapmak için daha fazla motive olacaklardır. Ek olarak, bu çalışma, karbon hakları ticaretinin ve karbon ücretlerinin, üreticilerin aktif atık su arıtımını ve atık ısı geri kazanımını iyileştirme üzerindeki olası etkisini dikkate almamaktadır; bu, gelecekteki araştırmalara değer bir yön olacaktır.

PDF (English)

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Abu Zayyad, H. M., Obeidat, Z. M., Alshurideh, M. T., Abuhashesh, M., Maqableh, M., & Masa’deh, R.
  2. E. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and patronage intentions: The mediating effect of brand credibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(5), 510–533.
  3. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159–77.
  4. Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020). Beyond good intentions: Designing CSR initiatives for greater social impact. Journal of Management, 46(6), 937–964.
  5. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1980). Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205–258.
  6. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31.
  7. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.
  8. Bosquet, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence.
  9. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 19–32.
  10. Chen, C. M., & Delmas, M. (2011). Measuring corporate social performance: An efficiency perspective.
  11. Production and Operations Management, 20, 789–804.
  12. Chen, J. H., Lai, C. C., & Shieh, J. Y. (2003). Anticipated environmental policy and transitional dynamics in an endogenous growth model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25(2), 233–254.
  13. Chen, L., Qie, K., Memon, H., & Yesuf, H. M. (2021). The empirical analysis of green innovation for fashion brands, perceived value and green purchase intention—mediating and moderating effects. Sustainability, 13(8), 4238.
  14. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 66–680.
  15. Corbett, C. J., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8(1), 5–22.
  16. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (1997). The influence of firm behaviour on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14, 419–432.
  17. Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information.
  18. International Economic Review, 10, 1–21.
  19. Fullerton, D., & Kim, R. S. (2008). Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2),141–154.
  20. Glueck, H., & Schleicher, S. P. (1995). Endogenous technical progress induced by CO2 reduction policies: Simulation results for Austria. Environmental and Resource Economics, 5(2), 151–163.
  21. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30(4): 777-798.
  22. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.
  23. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.
  24. Gupta, M. R., & Barman, T. R. (2009). Fiscal policies, environmental pollution and economic growth.
  25. Economic Modelling, 26(5), 1018–1028.
  26. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021. Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715.
  27. Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis.
  28. Ecological Economics, 70, 52–59.
  29. Jacobs, W. B., & Singhal, R. V., & Subramanian, R. (2008). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1320721
  30. Kanter, R., & Brinkerhoff, D. (1981). Organizational performance: Recent developments in measurement.
  31. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 321–349.
  32. King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.
  33. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.
  34. Koeppl, A., Kratena, K., Pichl, C., Schebeck, F., Schleicher, S., & Wueger, M. (1996). Macroeconomic and sectoral effects of energy taxation in Austria. Environmental and Resource Economics, 8(4), 417–430.
  35. Liao, P. C., Shih, Y. N., Wu, C. L., Zhang, X. L., & Wang, Y. (2018). Does corporate social performance pay back quickly? A longitudinal content analysis on international contractors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1328–1337.
  36. McEvoy, D. M., & Stranlund, J. K. (2010). Costly enforcement of voluntary environmental agreements. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(1), 45–63.
  37. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
  38. Osang, T., & Pereira, A. (1996). Import tariffs and growth in a small open economy. Journal of Public Economics, 60, 45–71.
  39. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.
  40. Parry, I. W. H., & Bento, A. M. (2000). Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the ‘double dividend’ hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 67–96.
  41. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48, 52–72.
  42. Peterson, P. P. (1989). Event study: A review of issues and methodology. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 28, 36–66.
  43. Scott, R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.
  44. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.
  45. Shane, P. B., & Spicer, B. H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. The Accounting Review, LVIII, 521–538.
  46. Shen, Y., Su, Z. W., Huang, G., Khalid, F., Farooq, M. B., & Akram, R. (2020). Firm market value relevance of carbon reduction targets, external carbon assurance and carbon communication. Carbon Management, 11(6): 549–563.
  47. Shiu, S. M., & Yang, S. L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide insurance- like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455–470.
  48. Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) and organizational performance: The moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100139.
  49. Sinkin, C., Wright, C. J., & Burnett, R. D. (2008). Eco‐efficiency and firm value. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 167–176.
  50. Smulders, S., & Gradus, R. (1996). Pollution abatement and long-term growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(3), 505–532.
  51. Walde, K., & Wood, C. (2004). The empirics of trade and growth: Where are the policy recommendations? International Economics and Economic Policy, 1, 275–292.
  52. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 46– 52. Wilcox, R. (2003). Applying contemporary statistical techniques. Academic Press.
  53. Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research 101: 697-706).
  54. Yang, S. L., Wu, P. I., & Lee, C. I. (2015). Will economic growth of a country be impeded by more corporate environmental performances? Environmental Economics, 6(1), 44–52.
  55. Zhou, P., & Wen, W. (2020). Carbon-constrained firm decisions: From business strategies to operations modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(1), 1–15.