Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Articles

THE EFFECTS OF HOSPITAL QUALITY OF CARE ON PATIENT BELONGING: STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODEL AND MEDIATION

Ali Rıza FİRUZAN
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi İstatistik Bölümü

Published 2017-09-16

How to Cite

FİRUZAN, A. R. (2017). THE EFFECTS OF HOSPITAL QUALITY OF CARE ON PATIENT BELONGING: STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODEL AND MEDIATION. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(2), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i2.129

Abstract

The aim of the study is to measure the effects of perceived and expected service quality levels on patient loyalty. In total, 370 patients participated in this research. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method to test the causal relationship model. The corresponding model in the study emerged as acceptable fit with the model. The result of the study indicate that perceived service quality and patient loyalty are statistically significant and positively related to each other. Additionally, perceived service quality has found to be an important mediator between expected service quality and patient loyalty. After patients have treatment in corresponding hospital, they have been affected by service quality as mush as cost of medication. As patient satisfaction increases, their loyalty increases. It is suggested to hospital management that they might course of action to patients for improving Reliability and Assurance SERVQUAL factors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Babakus, E ve Mangold GW (1992)“Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation”, Health Service Research, 26 (6), 767-786
  2. Bagozzi RP ve Yi Y (1988) “On the evaluation of Structural Equation Model” Journal of the academy of marketing science 16 (1), 74-94
  3. Berhane, A ve Enquselassie F (2016) “Patient expectations and their satisfaction in the context of public hospitals” Patient Prefer Adherence, 10, 1919-1928
  4. Byrne BM (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Taylor and Francis
  5. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis fort he behavioral sciences, 2.Baskı, Hillsdale NJ
  6. Dawn AG, Lee PP (2004) “Patient expectations for medical and surgical care: a review of the literature and applications to ophthalmology.” SurvOphthalmol, 49, 513-524
  7. Erdem İ, Yeloğlu HO (2007) Zaman Serisi Verilerine Bootstraping Metodu Uygulaması. 6. İstatistik Kongresi: Antalya
  8. Field, (2000) Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. London, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
  9. Fornell CG ve Larcker DF (1981) “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50
  10. Hair JF, Tatham RL, Anderson RE ve Black W (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 5.Baskı, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  11. Henseler J, Ringle CM ve Sinkovics RR (2009) “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing”, New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Volume 20) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 277 – 319.
  12. Hu, LT ve Bentler, PM (1998). “Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification” Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
  13. Hu, LT ve Bentler, PM (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  14. Jiang, JJ, Klein G, Parolia N ve Li Y (2012). “An analysis of three SERVQUAL variations in measuring information system service quality” Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 15 (2)
  15. Kim CE, Joon-Shik S, Jinho L, Yoon Jae L, Me-riong K, Areum C, Ki Byung P, Ho-Joo L ve In-Hyuk H (2017), “Quality of medical service, patient satisfaction and loyalty with a focus on interpersonal-based medical service encounters and treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional multicenter study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals”, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17, 174-186
  16. Lim PC, Tang NKH (2000a) “A study of patients' expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 13, 290-299
  17. Lim, PC ve Tang NKH (2000b), “Modifiedimportance-performanceanalysis: an applicationtohospitals”, International Journal of HealthCareQualityAssurance, 14 (3), 104-110
  18. Lim, PC ve Tang NKH (2000c), “Thedevelopment of a model for total qualityhealthcare”, Managing Service Quality, 10 (2), 103-111
  19. Litwin MS (1995) How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA: Sage
  20. Lohmöller, JB (1989) Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica
  21. Memon AH ve Rahman A (2014) “SEM-PLS Analysis of Inhibiting Factors of Cost Performance for Large Construction Projects in Malaysia: Perspective of Clients and Consultants” Scientific WorldJournal, Article ID 165158, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/165158
  22. Rahman, S, Erdem, R. ve Devebakan, N. (2007). “Hizmet kalitesinin SERVQUAL ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesi: Elazığ‟daki hastaneler üzerinde bir çalışma” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 37-55.
  23. Şimşek ÖF (2007) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine Giriş, Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Ankara
  24. T.C. Kuzey Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı (KUZKA), Özel Hastane Ön Fizibilite Raporu (2016), https://www.kuzka.gov.tr/paylasim/01_ozel_hastane_(on_fizibilite).pdf
  25. Venkatraman, N (1989) “The concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence”, Academy of Management, 14 (3), 423-444
  26. Virk, A, Kalia M, Gupta BP, Singh J (2013) “A study to evaluate patient expectation and satisfaction in tertiary care teaching hospital” Healthline, 4 (2), 64-68
  27. Wong, K.K (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, Technical Note 1, 1-32.
  28. Zeithaml VA, Berry LL ve Parasuraman A (1996) “The behavioral consequences of service quality” J Marketing, 60, 31-46.