Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Articles

AN APPLICATION ON BRAND POSITIONING ACTIVITIES OF POLITICAL PARTIES: GAZIANTEP SAMPLE

Bülent DEMİRAĞ
Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi, İşletme ABD
Ahmet TAN
GAZİANTEP ÜNV. İİBF, İŞLETME BÖLÜMÜ
Bio

Published 2018-01-07

How to Cite

DEMİRAĞ, B., & TAN, A. (2018). AN APPLICATION ON BRAND POSITIONING ACTIVITIES OF POLITICAL PARTIES: GAZIANTEP SAMPLE. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i4.145

Abstract

The aim in political marketing is to be able to determine the needs and desires of the voters correctly, to form and implement the policies towards the electorate and finally to be able to sustain the electorate in the political process and to form the electoral loyalty accordingly. Particularly, regardless of the voting rate, in the elections, the second party is considered to have lost the election, and for this reason, it is very important for the political parties that are political practitioners to come to the forefront in the politically high society where competition is experienced in the ruthless dimensions. In order to create this differentiation, it is crucial that the competitors, the market and other variables are analyzed well, the segmentation of the market, the formation and application of positioning-related policies and recertification-related strategies.

The aim of the work is to measure perceptions of the characteristics of voters who are thought to be influential in political party preferences. In this context, it has been investigated whether 11 different characteristics determined by voters make a meaningful difference with their demographic characteristics. The identification of these characteristics and their importance will provide significant advantages for political parties in their positioning strategies. Within this scope, face to face surveys and data were collected from the voters voting in the province of Gaziantep. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis. In this context, it was concluded that the factors affecting political party election differed significantly with demographic criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aaker, D.A. ve Shannsby, J.G. (1982). Positionning your product. Business Horizons, 25(3):56-62.
  2. Altunışık, R., Özdemir, Ş. ve Torlak, Ö. (2004). Modern Pazarlama. 2. Baskı, Değişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  3. Ar,A.A. and Sardan, R. (2004). ‘‘Markanın Oluşturulmasında Konumlandırma Stratejisi Ve Mavi Jeans Örneği’’. Mevzuat Dergisi, Yıl 7, Sayı, 81, Yıl :2004.
  4. Arlı, E. (2012). ‘‘Konumlandırma stratejilerinin işletme performansı ile ilişkisi: Liman işletmeciliğinde bir uygulama’’. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 19(2):99-120.
  5. Ateş, T. (1994). Demokrasi (Kavram-Tarihi Süreç-İlkeler). Ümit Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  6. Aydınol, P. (2010). Marka Konumlandırmada Tüketici Algılama Haritaları: Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  7. Bayraktaroğlu, G. (2002). ‘‘Geleneksel pazarlamada politik pazarlamanın yeri’’. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(3):58-82.
  8. Bongrand, M. (1992). Politikada Pazarlama. Ersoy, F. (Çev.), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  9. Cemalcılar, İ. (1987). Pazarlama karması (4p) kavramında yeni gelişmeler. Pazarlama Dünyası, 1(4):23-24.
  10. Daver, B. (1993). Siyaset Bilimine Giriş. Doğan Yayınevi, Ankara.
  11. French, A. ve Smith, G. (2010). ‘‘Measuring political brand equity: A consumer oriented approach’’. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3-4):460-477.
  12. İslamoğlu, A. Hamdi ve Fırat, Duygu (2011). Stratejik Marka Yönetimi. Beta Yayıncılık. İstanbul.
  13. Keller, K.L. (1998). Strategic Branding Management: Building Measuring and Managing Brand Equit. Pearson Education Inc., N.J.
  14. Kışlalı, A.T. (2005). Siyaset Bilimi. 11. Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
  15. Kotler, P. (1978). Marketing Für Nonprofit-Organisationen. Verlaganstalt, Stutgart.
  16. Kotler, P. (2000). Pazarlama Yönetimi. Muallimoğlu, N. (Çev.), Beta Yayınları, İstanbul
  17. Kotler, P. ve Armstrong, G. (2006).Principles of Marketing. 15. Eds. Upper Saddle River, N.J.
  18. Kotler, P. ve Levy, S. (1969). Brodening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33:10-15.
  19. Kotler, P. E Levy, L.K. ( 2012 ). Marketing Management. 14th edition, International Edition, PrenticeHall.
  20. Ozankaya, Ö. (1984). Temel Toplumbilim Terimler Sözlüğü. Savaş Yayınevi, Ankara.
  21. Özkan, N. (2007). Seçim Kazandıran Kampanyalar (Türkiye’den ve Dünyadan Örneklerle). 3. Baskı, Mediacat Yayınları, İstanbul.
  22. Öztürk, S.A. (1998). Hizmet Pazarlaması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir.
  23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. ve Berry, L.L. (1985). ‘‘A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research’’. Journal of Marketing, 49:41-50.
  24. Polat, C. (2015). Siyasal Pazarlama ve İletişim .Nobel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  25. Rafiq, M. ve Ahmed, P.K. (1995). ‘‘ Using the 7ps as a generic marketing mix: an exploratory survey of UK and European marketing academics’’. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(9):4-15.
  26. Ries, A. and Trout, J. (1981). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
  27. Savard, R. (1988). Guidelines fort the Teaching of Marketing in the Training of Librarians Documentalists and Archivists, UNESCO, Paris, ss.1-118.
  28. Tan, A. (2002). İlke ve Uygulamalarıyla Politik Pazarlama. Papatya Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  29. Uztuğ, F. (2003). Markan Kadar Konuş. 2. Baskı, Mediacat Yayınları, İstanbul.