Vol. 10 No. 4 (2022): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

Exploratory research on the factors affecting the sustainable consumption behaviour of gen Z

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Oğuz YILDIZ,
  • Alpaslan KELLECİ
Oğuz YILDIZ
Assist. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Gelişim University, Istanbul, Turkiye
Alpaslan KELLECİ
Assist. Prof. Dr., Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2134

Published 2022-12-25

Keywords

  • Pazarlama, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Sürdürülebilir Tüketim, Tüketici İktisadı: Deneysel Analiz, Çevre ve Kalkınma
  • Marketing, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Consumption, Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis, Environment and Growth

How to Cite

YILDIZ, O., & KELLECİ, A. (2022). Exploratory research on the factors affecting the sustainable consumption behaviour of gen Z. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(4), 1474–1491. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2134

Copyright (c) 2022 Oğuz YILDIZ - Alpaslan KELLECİ

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The consequential impact of flash floods, wildfires, collapsing fisheries, deforestation due to global climate change, and depleting natural resources indicates that the regnant production and consumption patterns are no longer tenable. So far, the traditional business approach under the influence of the Dominant Social Paradigm (DSP) has devoured limited planetary resources with the goal of pure profit maximization. Nevertheless, this dominant logic is outdated and cannot keep up with the changing consumption habits of conscious consumers and Gen Z. Today, mindful consumers and Gen Z expect business entities to minimize their negative externalities. They also expect business entities to contribute to environmental and social causes other than economic interests. The study aims to determine the dimensions of the variables that affect the sustainable consumption behaviour of the university students who represent Gen Z. The data has been gathered via non-random convenience sampling by administering face-to-face surveys among university students in Istanbul. First, exploratory factor analysis was conducted in data analysis, and then a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. Unlike the previous studies, the present study puts forward that sustainable consumption behaviour consists of nine dimensions with variables, including social sustainability. These dimensions are environmental and social concerns, perceived seriousness of environmental and social problems, perceived environmental and social responsibility, consumers’ existing knowledge about environmental and social problems, country image, word-of-mouth communication, social norms, and attitude and intention toward sustainable consumption.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127.
  2. Al-Swidi, A., & Saleh, R. M. (2021). How green our future would be? An investigation of the determinants of green purchasing behavior of young citizens in a developing Country. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(9), 13436–13468.
  3. Bansal, H., Voyer, P.A. (2000). “Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context.” J. Serv. Res. 3(2), 166–177.
  4. Bathmanathan, V., Rajadurai, J., (2018): Redefining the value proposition through green promotions and green corporate image in the era of Industrial Revolution 4.0: a study of Gen Y green consumers in Malaysia. Int. J. Environmental Technology and Management, 22(6), 456-477
  5. Biswas, A., Roy, M., 2015. Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the east. J. Clean. behav. 87, 462–468
  6. Borland, H., & Lindgreen, A. (2012). Sustainability, Epistemology, Ecocentric Business, and Marketing Strategy: Ideology, Reality, and Vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 173–187.
  7. Carrete, L., Castaño, R., Felix, R., Centeno, E. and González, E. (2012). Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: confusion, credibility, and compatibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 7, 470-481.
  8. Cerri, J., Testa, F., Rizzi, F., (2018). “The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers' attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 175(20), 343-353.
  9. Chen, S.-C., & Hung, C.-W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 155–163.
  10. Corral-Verdugo, V. and Pinheiro, J. (2004). Aproximaciones al estudio de la conducta sustentable”, Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, (5)1/2, 1-26.
  11. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.319–340.
  12. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, UK
  13. Gaskin, J. & Lim, J. (2016), "Master Validity Tool", AMOS Plugin. Gaskination's StatWiki.
  14. Garcia-Mira, R., Real, J.E. and Jose, R. (2005), “Temporal and spatial dimensions in the perception of environmental problems: an investigation of the concept of environmental hyperopia”, International Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 5-10.
  15. Francis, T., and Hoefel, F., (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies, McKinsey & Company, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328-388.
  17. Hair, Joseph F., Babin, Barry J., Anderson, Rolph E., Black, William C., (2019). “Multivariate Data Analysis” Eight Edition, Cengage, UK.
  18. Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen-Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 526–536.
  19. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120.
  20. Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T. A. (1999). Responsıbılıty As A Predıctor Of Ecologıcal Behavıour. Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 243–253.
  21. Kelleci, A., & Yıldız, O. (2021). A guiding framework for levels of sustainability in marketing. Sustainability, 13, 1644.
  22. Kemper, J.A.; Ballantine, P.W., (2019). What do we mean by sustainability marketing? J. Mark. Manag, 35, 277–309.
  23. Kilbourne, W., McDonagh, P., & Prothero, A. (1997), “Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: a macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm”, J. Macromarketing, Spring 1997: 4-24.
  24. Koller, M., Salzberger, T. (2007). Cognitive dissonance as a relevant construct throughout the decision-making and consumption process – an empirical investigation related to a package tour. J. Cust. Behav. 6(3), 217–227.
  25. Konuk, F.A.; Rahman, S.U., Salo, J. (2015). Antecedents of green behavioral intentions: A cross-country study of Turkey, Finland and Pakistan. Int. J. Consum. Stud, 39, 586–596.
  26. Kumar, P. and Ghodeswar, B.M. (2015), "Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 330-347.
  27. Lee, K. (2008), "Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 573-586.
  28. Liobikienė, G., Grincevičienė, Š., & Bernatonienė, J. (2017). Environmentally friendly behaviour and green purchase in Austria and Lithuania. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3789–3797.
  29. Liobikienė, G., Mandravickaitė, J., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study. Ecological Economics, 125, 38–46.
  30. Malhotra N. K., Dash S. (2011). “Marketing Research an Applied Orientation.” London: Pearson Publishing.
  31. Maniatis, P. (2016). Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 215–228.
  32. Manzo, L.C. and Weinstein, N.D. (1987), “Behavioural commitment to environmental protection: a study of active and nonactive members of the Sierra club”, Environmental and Behaviour, Vol. 19, pp. 673-94.
  33. Mohd Suki, N. (2016). Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: structural effects of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 204–214.
  34. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harrıs, K. E. (2001). Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.
  35. Mont, O., Neuvonen, A., Lähteenoja, S., 2014. Sustainable lifestyles 2050: stakeholder visions, emerging practices and future research. J. Clean. Prod. 63, 24–32.
  36. Mostafa, M.M. (2006).Antecedents of Egyptian consumers’ green purchase intentions: A hierarchical multivariate regression model. J.Int. Consum. Mark., 19, 97–126.
  37. OECD, (2009). “Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-innovation: Towards a Green Economy Policy Brief” https://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/42957785.pdf
  38. Rajadurai, J., Wan Hanafi, W.N., Bathmanathan, V. et al. (2021). “Developing nexus eco-purchasing behaviour index (NEPBI) for Malaysia by using partial least square analysis.” Qual Quant 55, 2017–2039.
  39. Ritter, A.M., Borchardt, M., Vaccaro, G.L.R., Pereira, G.M., Almeida, F., 2015. Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 507–520.
  40. Schultz, P.W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J.J. and Khazian, A.M. (2004), “Implicit connections with nature”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 31-42
  41. Stambor, Z. (2022). “Retailers push sustainability efforts to combat greenwashing claims” eMarketer https://www.emarketer.com/content/retailers-push-sustainability-efforts-combat-greenwashing-claims
  42. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170.
  43. Snowdon, K. (2021). “Greenpeace: İngiltere'deki plastik atıkların yaklaşık yüzde 40'ı Türkiye'ye ihraç edildi ve yasa dışı yollarla toplanıp yakıldı”. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-57140139
  44. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.144–176.
  45. Turel, O., Serenko, A. and Bontis, N. (2010) ‘User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective’, Information and Management, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.63–73.
  46. WCED (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford UNEP/Sustainability Ltd (2000) The Global Reporters, Sustainability Ltd, London.
  47. Wood, J., (2022). “Gen Z cares about sustainability more than anyone else – and is starting to make others feel the same” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/03/generation-z-sustainability-lifestyle-buying-decisions/
  48. Yıldız, O. (2021) ‘A PLS-SEM approach to the consumer adoption of shopping via mobile apps’, Int. J. Mobile Communications, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.589–614.
  49. Yıldız, O. (2022). How Can Business Enterprises Use Sustainability-Oriented Innovations as a Strategic Tool? In Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu (Ed.), Handbook of Research on SDGs for Economic Development, Social Development, and Environmental Protection (pp. 167-183). IGI Global Publishing.
  50. Zhao, R., Zhong, S. (2015). “Carbon labelling influences on consumers' behaviour: a system dynamics approach.” Ecol. Indic. 51, 98–106.