Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Articles

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT UNDER STRUCTURAL BREAK

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Umut HALAÇ,
  • Fatma Deniz ŞAŞMAZ
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i3.151

Published 2017-12-19

How to Cite

HALAÇ, U., & ŞAŞMAZ, F. D. (2017). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT UNDER STRUCTURAL BREAK. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(3), 684–702. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i3.151

Abstract

For the economies which aim for the sustainable economic growth, one of the most important topic is industrialization. It is thought that it effects employability positively, by increasing the manufacturing. This study investigates the long-term relationship between industrial production and total employment, industrial employment and youth employment in Turkey using monthly data for the period from 2005:01 to 2017:06. Since the period involving structural changes, the stability of series was tested by standart Augmented Dickey Fuller unit root test and Zivot Andrews unit root test with structural breaks. Estimates of the cointegrating relation are obtained using Engle-Granger test procedure and Gregory Hansen test procedure taking structural breaks into account. The results of cointegration tests show that there is no long run relationship among the variables. The findings of the study indicate that the connections between industrial production and employment have been disappeared, during the time period examined for Turkey. This also suggests that the rise in the industrial production is still far from creating employability.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acaroğlu, H. (2015). The Relationship Between Industrial Growth and Labor Force Markets in Turkey. Issues in Social Science, 3(1), 83-96.
  2. Ay, A. ve Koçar, Z. (2006). 2001 Sonrası Dönemde Türkiye Ekonomisinde Krizden Büyümeye Geçir Üzerine Bir Tartışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Ensititüsü Dergisi(16), 67-78.
  3. Caraiani, P. (2006). The Relationship Between Unemployment and Output Cycles in Korea. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting,1, 51-64.
  4. Çolak, M. ve Kara, O. (2017). Türkiye'deki Makroekonomik Göstergelerin İstihdama Etkisi. "Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Afro-Avrasya Özel Sayısı. 259-274.
  5. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association(74), 427-431.
  6. Enders, W. (1995). Applied Econometric Time Series. Iowa State University : John Wiley&Sons Inc.
  7. Engle, R. F. ve Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Represantation and Testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276.
  8. Evans, G.W. (1989). Output and Unemployment Dynamics in the United States: 1950–1985. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4(3), 213-237.
  9. Gabrisch, H. ve Buscher, H. (2006). The Relationship between Unemployment and Output in Post- communist Countries. Post- Communist Economies, 18(3), 261-276.
  10. Gordon, R. ve Clark, P. (1984). Unemployment and Potential Output in the 1980's. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 15(2), 537-564.
  11. Gregory, A. ve Hansen, B. E. (1996a). Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70, 99-126.
  12. Gregory, A. W. ve Hansen, B. E. (1996b). Test for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 58(3), 555-560.
  13. Günçavdı, Ö. ve Küçükçiftçi, S. (2006). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Büyümenin Kaynakları ve İstihdam Etkileri (1973-1998). İktisadi Büyümenin Dinamikleri ve İstihdam, 195-230.
  14. Hamada, K. ve Kurosaka, Y. (1984). The Relationship between Production and Unemployment in Japan. European Economic Review, 25(1), 71-94.
  15. Kara, M. ve Duruel, M. (2005). Türkiye'de Ekonomik Büyümenin İstihdam Yaratamama Sorunu. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 50(1), 367-396.
  16. Kılıç, E. ve Yıldırım, S. (2017). Is Jobless Growth Still a Problem for Turkey? V. Anadolu International Conference in Economics. Eskişehir, Turkey.
  17. Lee, J. (2000). The Robustness of Okun's Law: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 331-356.
  18. Moosa, I. (1997). A Cross-Country Comparision of Okun's Coefficient, Journal of Comparative Economics, 24(3), 335-356.
  19. Muratoğlu, Y. (2011). Büyüme ve İstihdam Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Örneği. International Conference On Eurasian Economies, (s. 167-173).
  20. Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP & Its Measurements and Significance. American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, 98-104.
  21. Saraçoğlu, B. ve Suiçmez, H. (2008). Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde Büyüme, İstihdam ve Verimlilik Sorunları. TİSK Akademi, 3(6), 88-126.
  22. Sögner, L. ve Stiassny, A. (2002). An Analysis on the Structural Stability of Okun's Law:A Cross-Country Study. Applied Economics, 14, 1775-1787.
  23. Şensen, F. ve Taymaz, E. (2003). Unutulan Bir Toplumsal Amaç: Sanayileşme Ne oluyor? Ne Olmalı? ERC Working Papers in Economics, 03/01.
  24. Taymaz, E. ve Suiçmez, H. (2005). Türkiye'de Verimlilik ve Kriz . Ankara: MPM Yayını.
  25. Uysal, D. ve Alptekin, V. (2009). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Büyüme-İşsizlik İlişkisinin Var Modeli Yardımıyla Sınanması (1980-2007). Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(25), 69-78.
  26. Weber, C. (1995). Cyclical Output, Cyclical Unemployment, and Okun's Coefficient: A New Approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(4), 443-454.
  27. Zivot, E. ve Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Cash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.