Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL ON SERVICE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE BY STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODEL: A RESEARCH ON HEALTHCARE EMPLOYEES

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Erhan EKİNGEN
Erhan EKİNGEN
Asisst. Prof. Dr., Batman University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1412

Published 2020-03-25

Keywords

  • Positive Psychological Capital, Service Innovation Performance, Structural Equation Model
  • Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye, Hizmet İnovasyon Performansı, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

How to Cite

EKİNGEN, E. (2020). INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL ON SERVICE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE BY STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODEL: A RESEARCH ON HEALTHCARE EMPLOYEES. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1412

Abstract

Efforts to producing new goods and services of employees are very important under increasing competitive conditions. In the health sectors where labor is intense, the feeling stronger of the employees themselves within the organization will also have an impact on the Innovations that are desired to be realized. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of positive psychological capital (PsyCap) on service innovation performance (SIP). In the research, questions prepared to determine the demographic and individual characteristics of the employees, a questionnaire form consisting of three parts was used: PsyCap (hope, optimism, self-efficacy and psychological resilience) scale and SIP (service Innovation behavior and new service development) scale. The universe of the research is the health workers in a general hospital in the health sector. For the evaluations made on 428 questionnaires, frequency analysis, t test, Anova test, correlation analysis and regression analysis were used. It was viewed that the research model tested by structural equation modeling was verified and PsyCap has been found to have a positive and significant effect on the SIP.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abbas, M. & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of Psychological Capital on Innovative Performance and Job Stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32, 128-138.
  2. Alegra, J., Lapiedra, R. & Chiva, R. (2006). A Measurement Scale For Product Innovation Performance. European Journal Of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333-346.
  3. Aliyev, R. & Tunç, E. (2015). Self-efficacy in Counseling: The Role of Organizational Psychological Capital, Job Satisfaction and Burnout, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 97-105.
  4. Amo, B. & Kolvereid, L. (2005). Organizational Strategy, Individual Personality and Innovation Behavir. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(1), 7-19.
  5. Aslaner, F. & Artan, İ. H. (2019). Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Vasıtasıyla Bireysel Performansı Etkilemedeki Rolü: Perakende Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1657-1689.
  6. Atuahene ‐ Gima, K. (2005). Resolving The Capability‐Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69, 61-83.
  7. Bandura, A. (1994), Self-Efficacy, In V.S. Ramachaudran (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Newyork: Academic Press.
  8. Bankacı, U. (2016). Psikolojik Sermaye Kavramı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Florya Chronicles of Political Economy, 2(2), 59-79.
  9. Begenirbaş, M. & Turgut E. (2016). Psikolojik Sermayenin Çalışanların Yenilikçi Davranışlarına ve Performanslarına Etkileri: Savunma Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 31 (1). 57-93.
  10. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Optimism, In C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez, (Eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology, s. 231-243, UK: Oxford University Press.
  11. Çavuş, M. F. & Gökçen, A. (2015). Psychological Capital: Definition, Components and Effects. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 5(3): 244-255.
  12. Çetin, F & Basım, H.N. (2012). Örgütsel Psikolojik Sermaye: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (45)1, 121-137.
  13. Cheung, F., Tang, S. K. & Tang, S. (2011). Psychological Capital As a Moderator Between Emotional Labor, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction Among School Teachers in China. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 348-371.
  14. Chiang, Y.H. & Hung, K.P. (2010). Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance From The Perspective of İnter-Organizational Knowledge Flows. R&D Management, 40, 292-299.
  15. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  16. De Jong, J. P. J., Bruins, A., Dolfsma, W., & Meijaard, J. (2003). Innovation in Service Firms Explored: What, How and Why? Literature Review. Strategic Study. EIM Business and Policy Research. Erişim: www.eim.nl/smes-andentrepreneurship.
  17. Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring Innovation Culture in Organizations: The Development of A Generalized Innovation Culture Construct Using Exploratory Factor Analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559.
  18. Ekingen, E., Mehmet, A. E., Yıldız, A., & Korkmazer, F. (2018). The Effect of Intrapreneurship and Organizational Factors on the Innovation Performance in Hospital. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 62, 196-219.
  19. Gustafsson, A. & Johnson, M. (2003), Competing in a Service Economy: How to Create a Competitive Advantage Trough Service Development and Innovation, USA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  20. Hu, M.L. M., Horng, J.S., & Christine Sun, Y. H. (2009). Hospitality Teams: Knowledge Sharing and Service Innovation Performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50.
  21. Karadal, H. & Özsungur, F. (2017). Hizmet İnovasyon Davranışı ile Psikolojik Sermaye ve Etik Liderlik İlişkisinin İncelenmesi: Adana Örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 663 -672.
  22. Karaırmak, Ö. & Siviş, R. (2008). Modernizmden Postmodernizme Geçiş ve Pozitif Psikoloji. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(30) 102-115.
  23. Karatepe-Kuşcu, H., Kuşcu, F.N., & Karaman, M. (2019). Psikolojik Sermayenin Bireysel Performansa Etkisi: Hemşireler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (Eğitim & Psikoloji) 105-114.
  24. Korkmazer, F., Ekingen, E. & Yıldız, A . (2016). Psikolojik Sermayenin Çalışan Performansına Etkisi: Sağlık Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 19 (3) , 271-281.
  25. Larson, M. & Luthans, F. (2006). Potential Added Value of Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13 (1), 45-62.
  26. Luthans, F. & Jensen, S. M. (2002). Hope: A New Positive Strength for Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 304-322.
  27. Luthans, F. & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
  28. Luthans, F. Luthans, K. W. & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive Psychological Capital: Beyond Human and Social Capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
  29. Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J. ve Peterson, S.J. (2010). The Development and Resulting Performance Impact of Positive Psychological Capital, Human Resource Developmet Quarterly, 21(1), 41-67.
  30. Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., Norman, S., & Combs, G. (2006). Psychological Capital Development: Toward A Micro-İntervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 387-393.
  31. Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J. & Avey, J. B. (2008). The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Supportive Organizational Climate–Employee Performance Relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior 29 (2008), 219- 238.
  32. Luthans, Fred. (2002), The Need for and Meaning of Positive Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706.
  33. MacInnis, D.J. & de Mello, G.E. (2005). The Concept of Hope and Its Relevance to Product Evaluation and Choice. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1-14.
  34. Matear, S., Gray B. J. & Garrett, T. (2004) Market Orientation, Brand Investment, New Service Development, Market Position and Performance for Service Organizations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15 (3), 284-301.
  35. Meydan, C. H. & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi – Amos Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  36. Norman, S. M., Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L. & Graber-Pigeon, N. P. (2010). The İnteractive Effectsof Psychological Capital and Organizational İdentity on Employee Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies,17, 380–391.
  37. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive Psychology, Positive Prevention and Positive Therapy, In C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez, (Eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology. NY: Oxford University Press.
  38. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  39. Sürücü, L., Maşlakçı, A. & Şeşen, H. (2020). The role of positive psychological capital in the effect of leadership styles on organizational commitment: A study of hospitality services African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 9 (2), 1-16.
  40. Yetgin, M. A. (2017). Çalışanların Cinsiyet ve Eğitim Düzeyinin Psikolojik Sermaye Algıları Üzerine Yönelik Görgül Bir Araştırma. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 52 (2), 120-139.
  41. Yıldız, H. & Örücü, E. (2016). Sağlık Sektörü Çalışanlarının Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (1), 269-285.
  42. Youssef, C.M. & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace: The Impact of Hope, Optimism, and Resilience. Journal of Management 33 (5), 774-800.
  43. Yücel, E. (2019). Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatminine Etkisi: Turizm Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7 (4), 1136-1154.