Vol. 7 No. 5 (2019): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

MEDIATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP'S EFFECT ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Hüseyin ASLAN
Hüseyin ASLAN
Asisst. Prof. Dr., Osmaniye Korkut Ata University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i5.1299

Published 2019-12-25

Keywords

  • Inclusive Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, Innovative Work Behavior
  • Kapsayıcı Liderlik, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, Yenilikçi İş Davranışı

How to Cite

ASLAN, H. (2019). MEDIATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP’S EFFECT ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2945–2963. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i5.1299

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how inclusive leadership affects the perceived organizational support and innovative work behaviors of employees and whether perceived organizational support has a mediating role in this process. For this purpose, data were collected from 348 participants working at different carpet manufacturing companies in Gaziantep. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed in the analysis of the data, correlations between the variables were determined, and structural equation and goodness of fit tests of the model and regression analysis were performed. In the analyses, it was determined that inclusive leadership had a significant positive effect on perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior. Perceived organizational support was found to have a significant positive effect on innovative work behavior. As a result of mediating analysis, perceived organizational support was found to have a partial mediator role in the relationship between inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Akgunduz, Y., ve Sanli, S. C. (2017). The effect of employee advocacy and perceived organizational support on job embeddedness and turnover intention in hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31, 118-125.
  2. Arshadi, N. (2011). The relationships of perceived organizational support (POS) with organizational commitment, in-role performance, and turnover intention: Mediating role of felt obligation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1103-1108.
  3. Bammens, Y. P. (2016). Employees' innovative behavior in social context: A closer examination of the role of organizational care. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(3), 244-259.
  4. Bos-Nehles, A. C., & Veenendaal, A. A. (2019). Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2661-2683.
  5. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
  6. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
  7. Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(6), 931-943.
  8. Çınar, Ö. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel destek ve örgütsel adaletin örgütsel çıktılar üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının aracılık rolü: Kahramanmaraş bankacılık sektöründe bir alan araştırması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi,
  9. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  10. Eroğlu, A., Topçu, M. K., & Basım, H. N. (2018). Bireysel Yenilikçi Davranışların Çalışma Arkadaşları ile Çatışma ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkileri: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(1), 123-136.
  11. Gaudet, M. C., & Tremblay, M. (2017). Initiating structure leadership and employee behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and leader–member exchange. European Management Journal, 35(5), 663-675.
  12. Güğerçin, U., & Ay, Ü. (2016). Etik konumun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: etik konum kuramı çerçevesinde bir analiz. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 19 (32), 34-46.
  13. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. (3.Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  14. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Amos ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  15. Hollander E.P. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. New York, America: Taylor Francis Group.
  16. Hollander, E. P. (2012). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. New York: Routledge.
  17. Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co‐workers. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 76(3), 347-364.
  18. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2018a). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-18.
  19. Javed, B., Khan, A. K., & Quratulain, S. (2018b). Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Examination of LMX Perspective in Small Capitalized Textile Firms. The Journal of psychology, 152(8), 594-612.
  20. Lin, Y.Y. C., & Liu, F. C. (2012). A cross-level analysis of organizational creativity climate and perceived innovation: The mediating effect of work motivation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 55–76.
  21. Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2016). When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 635-653.
  22. Mert, İ. S., & Şen, C. (2019). Örgütsel destek, örgütsel adalet ve öz kendilik değerlendirmesinin psikolojik sermaye üzerindeki etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36), 213-231.
  23. Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: AMOS uygulamaları, (2.Baskı). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  24. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941-966.
  25. Okpozo, A. Z., Gong, T., Ennis, M. C., & Adenuga, B. (2017). Investigating the impact of ethical leadership on aspects of burnout. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(8), 1128-1143.
  26. Rehman, W. U., Ahmad, M., Allen, M. M., Raziq, M. M., & Riaz, A. (2019). High involvement HR systems and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment, and the moderating roles of manager and co-worker support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 525-535.
  27. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55-77.
  28. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
  29. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
  30. Saether, E. A. (2019). Motivational antecedents to high-tech R&D employees' innovative work behavior: Self-determined motivation, person-organization fit, organization support of creativity, and pay justice. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, (In Press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2019.100350
  31. Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  32. Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.
  33. Wang, Y. X., Yang, Y. J., Wang, Y., Su, D., Li, S. W., Zhang, T., & Li, H. P. (2019). The Mediating Role of Inclusive Leadership: Work Engagement and Innovative Behavior among Chinese Head Nurses. Journal of nursing management. 27, 688–696.
  34. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15-30.
  35. West, M. A., & Rickards, T. (1999). Innovation. In M. A. Runco, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. 2. (pp. 45–55). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  36. Xiaotao, Z., Yang, X., Diaz, I., & Yu, M. (2018). Is too much inclusive leadership a good thing? An examination of curvilinear relationship between inclusive leadership and employees’ task performance. International Journal of Manpower, 39(7), 882-895.
  37. Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal. (In Press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006