Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY IN STUDENTS: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT

PDF (Türkçe)
  • Mehmet YORULMAZ
Mehmet YORULMAZ
Assist. Prof. Dr., Selçuk University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i1.1056

Published 2019-03-19

Keywords

  • Health Management,
  • Self-Efficacy,
  • Behavior
  • Sağlık Yönetimi,
  • Öz-Yeterlik,
  • Davranış

How to Cite

YORULMAZ, M. (2019). ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY IN STUDENTS: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(1), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i1.1056

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the academic self-efficacy levels of health management students.

Metarial and Methods: Self-Efficacy Scale of Academic and Personal Information Form were used in the study. The universe of the study comprised Health Management students of Selçuk University Faculty of Health Sciences (N= 600). The questionnaire was electronically sent to all students in the universe, and 237 questionnaires were answered. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 program. Nonparametric test techniques were used in the analyses according to the normality test. In comparisons, Mann-Whitney U was used for pair-wise comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for over two groups. In addition, correlations between both general and dimensions performed simple linear and multiple regression analyses. The Cronbach‘s alpha of the scale was very reliable as 0.953.

Findings: In this study, academic self-efficacy levels of students were analyzed in terms of variables such as education, gender, age, grade, and economic situation. About 70% of the participants are female students. Second-grade students’ participation level is higher than other grades. The percentage of mothers graduated with primary school is higher than the rate of fathers graduated with primary school. Percentage of fathers with the bachelor’s degrees is much higher than that of mothers. Household income of ¼ of the participants is above 3600 TL. While academic self-efficacy and sub-dimensions differ according to class level, they do not differ according to gender and parental education. While the academic self-efficacy and sub-dimensions significantly differ according to the students’ grade levels, it does not differ according to the parents' (father) educational status. Academic self-efficacy and sub-dimensions differ according to the students’ grades and monthly average income.

Results: As a result of the findings of the study, it was found that academic effort and academic planning affected the academic problems.

PDF (Türkçe)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbay, S. E. (2009). Cinsiyete Göre Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Erteleme Davranışı: Akademik Güdülenme, Akademik Öz-yeterlik ve AkademikYükleme Stillerinin Rolü. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, MersinÜniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
Aktaş, H. (2017). Akademik Güdülenme İle Akademik Özyeterlik Arasındaki İlişki:
İlahiyat Fakültesi Öğrencileri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri
Araştırmaları Dergisi Cilt / Vol: 6, Sayı/Issue: 3, 2017 Sayfa: 1376-1398.
Azar, A. (2010). Ortaöğretim Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Özyeterlik İnançları. ZKÜ Sosyal bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), 235-252.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifyingtheory of behavioralchange. PsychologyReview, 84, 191- 215.
Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in theexercise of controlover AIDS infection. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 9-17.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in ChangingSocieties. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. Retrievedfromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=711687&lang=tr&site=es-live&scope=site&authtype=uid
Breso, E., Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M. (2011). Can a Self-Efficacy-BasedİnterventionDecreaseBurnout, İncreaseEngagement, AndEnhancePerformance? A Quasi-ExperimentalStudy. HigherEducation, 61, 339-355.
Chun, A.H.C., ve Choi, J.N. (2005). Rethinkingprocrastination: Positiveeffects of “active”
procrastinationbehavior on attitudesandperformance. TheJournal of SocialPsychology, 145,
245-264.
Cordero, E., Porter, S., Israel, T., Brown, M. (2010). Math andsciencepursuits: A self-efficacyinterventioncomparisonstudy. Journal of CareerAssessment, 18, 362-375.
Eggen, P. ve Kauchak, D. (1999). EducationalPsychology. (4th ed.). New Jersey: Printice-Hall, Inc.
Ferrari, J. R. (1989). Reliability of academicanddispositionalmeasures of procrastination.
PsychologicalReports, 64, 1057-1058
Gül, İ., Adıgüzel, O. (2015). Sağlık Kurumları Yöneticiliği Lisans Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Öz Yeterlilik Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(36);864-875.
Güzel, H. (2017). Lise Öğrencilerinin Akademik Öz-yeterlik İnanç Düzeylerinin İnternet Kullanımı Ve Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Inesjournal, Yıl: 4, Sayı: 11, Haziran 2017, s. 225-245.
http://www.tuik.gov.tr, Erişim tarihi: 05/01/2019
Kandemir, M. (2010). Akademik Erteleme Davranışını Açıklayacı Bir Model. Doktora Tezi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler, Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara
Koç, C., Arslan, A. (2017). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Akademik Öz Yeterlik Algıları ve Okuma Stratejileri Bilişüstü Farkındalıkları. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (YYU Journal Of EducationFaculty), 14(1):745-778
Lorig, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D., Hobbs, M. (2001). Effect of a self-management program on patientswithchronicdisease. EffectiveClinicalPractice, 4, 256-262.
Margolis, H., Mccabe, P. P. (2004). Self efficacy: A keytoimprovingthemotivation
of strugglinglearners. TheClearing House, 77, 241-249.
Marks, R., Allegrante, J. P. (2005). A ReviewandSynthesis of ResearchEvidencefor Self-Efficacy-EnhancingInterventionsforReducingChronicDisability: ImplicationsforHealthEducationPractice (Part II). HealthPromotionPractice, 6(2): 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904266792
Öncü, H. (2012). Akademik Özyeterlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe’yeUyarlanması.Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), Nisan, 13(1):183-206
Özgül, F., Diker, G. (?). Lisansüstü Eğitim Adaylarının Akademik Özyeterlik Ve Güdülenmelerinin Demografik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi (Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Örneği). Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2); 2129-2139
Pajares, F., Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self-efficacyand self-conceptbeliefs in mathematicalproblemsolving: A pathanalysis. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 86, 193-203.
Pajares, F., Schunk, D. (2001). Self-beliefsandschoolsuccess: Self-Efficacy, Self-ConceptAnd School Achievement. R. Riding ve S. Rayner (Eds.). Perception içinde (s. 239-266). London: JAI press.
Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacybeliefs in self-regulatedlearning. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivationand self-regulatedlearning: Theory, research, andapplications (pp. 111-139). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociatesPublishers.
Shortridge-Baggett, L. M., &Lenz, E. R. (2002). Self-EfficacyInNursing :ResearchandMeasurementPerspectives. New York: Springer Publishing Company. Retrievedfrom http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=246184&lang=tr&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=uid.
Yalnız, A. (2014). Akademik Öz-Yeterlik: Olumlu ve Olumsuz Duygulanımın
Yordayıcı Rolü. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 95-101.
Yıldırım-Kaptanoğlu A, İşçi E. Sağlık Alanında Hipotezden Teze: Veri Toplama ve Çözümleme Serüveni. Beşir Kitabevi. İstanbul. Şubat 2013.