Published 2022-06-25
Keywords
- Factor Models, CAPM, Fama-French, Carhart, Momentum, Q- Factor, Value Added Intellectual Coefficient
- Faktör Modelleri, CAPM, Fama- French, Carhart- Momentum, q- Faktör, Entelektüel Katma Değer Katsayı
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Gökhan ÖZER- Ayşegül YILDIRIM KUTBAY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to test the validity of multi-factor asset pricing models on the portfolios of non-financial companies whose shares are traded on Borsa Istanbul and to identify the model with the best explanatory power. Accordingly, the relationships between annual book-to-market equity ratio, firm size, market portfolio return, return on capital, operating profitability, momentum and value-added intellectual coefficient between 2008-2019 were analyzed using panel data analysis. As a result of the analyses made, it has been observed that Fama French's three and five factors, Carhart (momentum), q-factor, and suggested models are successful in explaining the returns of portfolios formed by non-financial companies. Furthermore, according to the GRS-F test statistic, the q-factor model was found to have higher explanatory power than other models.
References
- Arı , G., & Sarıoglu, S. (2021). Fama French Beş Faktörlü Varlık Fiyatlama Modelinin Borsa İstanbul'da 2006–2018 Dönemi İçin Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi. 1. Sosyal Ekonomik Arastırmalar Dergisi, 21(2), 114-131.
- Bildik, R., & Gülay, G. (2007). Profitability of contrarian strategies: Evidence from the Istanbul stock exchange. International Review of Finance, 7(1-2), 61-87.
- Bolak, M. (2004). Risk ve Yönetimi. İstanbul: Birsen Yayınevi.
- Campbell, J. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political economy, 104(2), 298-345.
- Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 52(1), 57-82.
- Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R., & Zhang, L. (2011). An alternative three-factor model. Available at SSRN 1418117, 1-26.
- Chiah, M., Chai, D., Zhong, A., & Li, S. (2016). (2016). Daha İyi Bir Model mi? Avustralya'da Fama-Fransız beş faktör modelinin ampirik bir araştırması. Uluslararası Finans İncelemesi , 16 (4), 595-638. International Review of Finance, 16(4), 595-638.
- Doğan, M., Elitaş, B., & Altınay, A. (2019). Fama-French Beş Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modeli: Borsa. 23. Finans SempozyumU, (s. 224-237). İstanbul.
- Dženopoljac, V., Janoševic, S., & Bontis, N. (2016). Intellectual capital and financial performance in the Serbian ICT industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 373-396.
- Ekim, N., Acar, M., & Uçan, O. (2019). Entelektüel Sermayenin Finans Sektöründe Değer Yaratmadaki Rolü: Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Verimlilik Dergisi, 4, 37-63.
- Fabozzi, F., Huang, D., & Wang, J. (2016). What difference do new factor models make in portfolio allocation? Working Paper, EDHEC, 1-52.
- Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 50(1), 131-155.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2006). Profitability, investment and average returns. Journal of financial economics, 82(3), 491-518.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 457-472.
- Fama, E., & French, K. (1998). Value versus growth: The international evidence. The journal of finance, 53(6), 1975-1999.
- Fama, E., & French, K. (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463.
- Fama, E., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial economics, 116(1), 1-22.
- Genç, E., & Çömlekçi, İ. (2018). Fama-French Üç Faktörlü Varlık Fiyatlama Modeli’nin Geçerliliği: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,, 40, 257-276.
- Gibbons, M., Ross, S., & Shanken, J. (1989). A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(5), 1121-1152.
- Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
- Güler, A., ÇAM, İ., Zavalsiz, B., & Keskin, S. (2018). Fama-French çok faktör varlık fiyatlama modellerinin performanslarının karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir uygulama. Istanbul business research, 47(2), 183-207.
- Gürkan, S., Gökbulut, R., & Çolak, N. (2015). Entelektüel katma değer katsayısı bileşenlerinin işletmelerin finansal performansı üzerindeki etkisi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(2), 45-64.
- Heaton, J., & Lucas, D. (2000). Portfolio choice and asset prices: The importance of entrepreneurial risk. The journal of finance, 55(3), 1163-1198.
- Hohlfelder, B., Sylvester, K., Rimsans, J., DeiCicchi, D., & Connors, J. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a bivalirudin to warfarin transition nomogram. Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis,, 43(4), 498-504.
- Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 650-705.
- Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of finance, 48(1), 65-91.
- Kang, H., Kang, J., & Kim, W. (2019). A comparison of new factor models in the Korean stock market. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 48(5), 593-614.
- Lintner, J. (1964). Optimal dividends and corporate growth under uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 49-95.
- Lustig, H., Van Nieuwerburgh, S., & Verdelhan, A. (2013). The wealth-consumption ratio. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 3(1), 38-94.
- Maiti, M., & Balakrishnan, A. (2018). Is human capital the sixth factor? Journal of Economic Studies, 45(4), 710-737.
- Markowitz , H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
- Meles, A., Porzio, C., Sampagnaro, G., & Verdoliva, V. (2016). The impact of the intellectual capital efficiency on commercial banks performance: Evidence from the US. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 36, 64-74.
- Nimtrakoon, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN. Journal of intellectual capital, 16(3), 587-618.
- Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of financial economics, 108(1), 1-28.
- Odabaşoğlu, Ş. (2019). Havayolu işletmelerinde entelektüel sermayenin piyasa değeri-defter değeri oranına etkileri. Journal of Aviation Research, 1(1), 1-23.
- Özkan, N. (2019). q-Faktör Modelinin Borsa İstanbul’da geçerliliğinin test edilmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 441-456.
- Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC™–an accounting tool for IC management. International journal of technology management, 20(5-8), 702-714.
- Pulic, A., & Kolakovic, M. (2003). Value creation efficiency in the new economy. Global Business and Economics Review, 5(1), 111-128.
- Rehman, A., & Baloch, Q. (2016). Evaluating Pakistan's Mutual Fund Performance: Validating through CAPM and Fama French 3-Factor Model. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 10(1), 173-182.
- Roy, R., & Shijin, S. (2018). A six-factor asset pricing model. Borsa Istanbul Review,, 18(3), 205-217.
- Saleh, M. (2020). Empirical Testing of the Five-Factor Model of Fama and French in Indonesia as an Emerging Capital Market. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1), 19-28.
- Sardo, F., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2017). A European empirical study of the relationship between firms’ intellectual capital, financial performance and market value. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(4), 771-788.
- Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.
- Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 935-964.
- Ståhle, P., Ståhle, S., & Aho, S. (2011). Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): a critical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 531-551.
- Sveiby, K.-E. (1988). A nova riqueza das A nova riqueza das organizações organizações. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
- Tatoğlu, F. (2016). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
- Usta , Ö., & Demireli, E. (2010). Risk Bileşenleri Analizi: İmkb'de Bir Uygulama. Zonguldak Karaelmas University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(12), 25–36 .
- Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Second Edition: MIT Press.
- Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2020). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a modified and extended VAIC model. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 161-176.
- Zeren, F., Yılmaz, T., & Belke, M. (2018). Fama French Beş Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modelinin Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Katılımlı 22. Finans Sempozyumu, (s. 391-400). Mersin.