Vol. 8 No. 5 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

PORTFOLIO AND BENCHMARK RETURNS OF PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY

PDF
  • Fatih KAYHAN,
  • Mehmet İSLAMOĞLU,
  • Mehmet APAN
Fatih KAYHAN
Assistant Professor, Kırklareli University
Mehmet İSLAMOĞLU
Associate Professor, Karabük University
Mehmet APAN
Assistant Professor, Karabuk University

Published 2020-12-25

Keywords

  • Pension Funds, Portfolio Returns, Benchmark Returns
  • Emeklilik Fonları, Portföy Getirileri, Benchmark Getirileri

How to Cite

PORTFOLIO AND BENCHMARK RETURNS OF PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. (2020). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(5), 3891-3910. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i5.1618

Copyright (c) 2020 Business & Management Studies: An International Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

PORTFOLIO AND BENCHMARK RETURNS OF PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. (2020). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(5), 3891-3910. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i5.1618

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether pension fund returns are in line with benchmark returns taking into account the regulatory structure in Turkey. The methodology of the study is the cumulative portfolio returns. Data is retrieved from TEFAS Platform and official web site of Capital Market Board of Turkey. Portfolio and benchmark of pension funds are compared. Only standard pension funds are covered within the scope of voluntary pension funds of Turkey. Findings are as follows; Portfolio returns and benchmark returns are in line significantly. The results are partly attributable to the regulations about pension fund management and portfolio structure. The paper also shows that in the long term, the volatility of returns decreases and returns prove to conform with the primary purpose of the private pension system.                            

PDF

References

  1. Albrecht, W. G., & Hingorani, V. L. (2004). Effects of Governance Practices and Investment Strategies on State and Local Government Pension Fund Financial Performance. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(8-9), 673-700.
  2. Alestalo, N., & Puttonen, V. (2006). Asset Allocation in Finnish Pension Funds. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5(1), 27-44.
  3. Ammann, M., & Ehmann, C. (2017). Is Governance Related to Investment Performance and Asset Allocation? Empirical Evidence from Swiss Pension Funds. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics(153), 293-339.
  4. Antolin, P. (2008). Pension Fund Performance. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions. Paris-France: OECD publishing.
  5. Bayar, Y. (2017). Individual Pension Funds and Capital Market Development in Turkey. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 9(2), 95-109.
  6. Berthon, J., Cronin, C., Prache, G., Struwe, K., & Viver, J. M. (2013). Private Pensions: The Real Return. A Research Report by EuroFinUse The European Federation of Financial Services Users. Brussels-Belgium: EuroFinUse. https://betterfinance.eu/wp-content/uploads/publications/Pension_Study_EN_website.pdf
  7. Blake, D., Lehmann, B. N., & Timmermann, A. (1999). Asset Allocation Dynamics and Pension Fund Performance. The Journal of Business, 72(4), 429-461.
  8. Brinson, G. P., Diermeier, J. J., & Schlarbaum, G. G. (1986). A Composite Portfolio Benchmark for Pension Plans. Financial Analysts Journal, 42(2), 15-24.
  9. Broeders, D., & Haan, L. d. (2018). Benchmark Selection and Performance. Working Paper No. 603. Amsterdam-The Netherlands: De Nederlandsche Bank NV.
  10. CMB. (2020). Capital Markets Board of Turkey. www.cmb.gov.tr
  11. EGM. (2020). Pension Monitoring Authority of Turkey (Emeklilik Gözetim Merkezi). www.egm.org.tr
  12. Ertuğrul, H. M., Gebeşoğlu, P. F., & Atasoy, B. S. (2018). Mind the Gap: Turkish Case Study of Policy Change in Private Pension Schemes. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(2), 140-149.
  13. Forbes Turkey. (2020). Emeklilik ve Yatırım Fon Raporu 2020. Forbes Turkey.
  14. Gökçen, U., & Yalçın, A. (2015). The Case Against Active Pension Funds: Evidence from the Turkish Private Pension System. Emerging Markets Review, 23, 46-67.
  15. Hinz, R., Rudolph, H. P., Antolín, P., & Yermo, J. (2010). Evaluating the Financial Performance of Pension Funds. Washington DC, USA: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/664431468337199780/pdf/527090PUB0pens101Official0Use0only1.pdf
  16. HMB. (2020). Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı. www.hmb.gov.tr
  17. Kuzubaş, T. U., Saltoğlu, B., Sert, A., & Yüksel, A. (2019). Performance Evaluation of The Turkish Pension Fund System. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 3(1), 18-33.
  18. OECD. (2019). Pension Markets in Focus 2019.
  19. OECD. (2020). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. www.oecd.org
  20. Şahin, S., Özdemir, Z. A., & Önal, Y. B. (2018). Türkiye’de Bireysel Emeklilik Sisteminin Sermaye Piyasasının Gelişimi Üzerindeki Etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 517-541.
  21. TEFAS. (2020). Türkiye Elektronik Fon Alım Satım Paltformu. www.tefas.gov.tr.
  22. Toğan-Eğrican, A. , & Kayhan, F. (2020). Voluntary Private Pension Funds and Capital Market Development in Turkey. Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3518442
  23. Tonks, I. (2006). Pension Fund Management and Investment Performance. G. L. Clark, A. H. Munnell, & J. M. Orszag içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income.