The effect of error acknowledgment on consumer responses to human and AI influencers<sup></sup>
PDF

Keywords

AI Influencers, Error Acknowledgment, Parasocial Interaction

How to Cite

The effect of error acknowledgment on consumer responses to human and AI influencers. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1874-1891. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2844

Abstract

Human and artificial intelligence (AI) influencers increasingly share product recommendations, yet how consumers react when these actors respond to an informational error remains unclear. This study examines whether acknowledging responsibility for an error, rather than denying it, produces different consumer responses for human and AI influencers. A 2 (influencer type: human vs. AI) × 2 (error response: acknowledgment vs. denial) between-subjects scenario experiment was conducted with 496 social media users. Data were analysed using MANOVA, ANOVAs, and moderated serial mediation with 5,000 bootstrap samples. Error acknowledgment increased perceived warmth, parasocial interaction, trust, and purchase intention for both influencer types, although effects were substantially stronger for human influencers. A crossover interaction emerged for perceived competence: acknowledgment raised competence for the human influencer but lowered it for the AI influencer. Indirect effects on trust and purchase intention operated mainly through warmth, whereas the competence penalty reached behavioural intentions only serially via parasocial interaction. Findings specify boundary conditions of the pratfall effect and reveal a competence cost of AI transparency.

Article Usage Statistics

Abstract views
215
PDF downloads
110
Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF

References

Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1086/651566

Abele, A. E., Ellemers, N., Fiske, S. T., Koch, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2021). Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychological Review, 128(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000262

Allal-Chérif, O., Puertas, R., & Carracedo, P. (2024). Intelligent influencer marketing: How AI-powered virtual influencers outperform human influencers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123113

Ao, L., Bansal, R., Pruthi, N., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2023). Impact of social media influencers on customer engagement and purchase intention: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032744

Ashraf, A., Hameed, I., & Saeed, S. A. (2023). How do social media influencers inspire consumers' purchase decisions? The mediating role of parasocial relationships. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12917

Auter, P. J. (1992). Psychometric: TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364165

Baek, T. H., Kim, J., & Kim, J. H. (2026). Effect of disclosing AI-generated content on prosocial advertising evaluation. International Journal of Advertising, 45(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2024.2401319

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, M. (2024). Human versus virtual influences, a comparative study. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114493

Berger, B., Adam, M., Rühr, A., & Benlian, A. (2021). Watch me improve-algorithm aversion and demonstrating the ability to learn. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00678-5

Bernritter, S. F., Verlegh, P. W., & Smit, E. G. (2016). Why nonprofits are easier to endorse on social media: The roles of warmth and brand symbolism. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.10.002

Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x

Brüns, J. D., & Meißner, M. (2024). Do you create your content yourself? Using generative artificial intelligence for social media content creation diminishes perceived brand authenticity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103790

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805

Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: Understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102940

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Choi, S., Mattila, A. S., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). To err is human(-oid): How do consumers react to robot service failure and recovery?. Journal of Service Research, 24(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520978798

Chung, S., & Lee, S. (2021). Crisis management and corporate apology: The effects of causal attribution and apology type on publics' cognitive and affective responses. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417735646

Cocker, H., Mardon, R., & Daunt, K. L. (2021). Social media influencers and transgressive celebrity endorsement in consumption community contexts. European Journal of Marketing, 55(7), 1841–1872. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2019-0567

Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

Dabiran, E., Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Grant, G. (2024). Virtually human: Anthropomorphism in virtual influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103797

Dedeoğlu, B. B., Bilgihan, A., Ye, B. H., Wang, Y., & Okumus, F. (2021). The role of elaboration likelihood routes in relationships between user-generated content and willingness to pay more. Tourism Review, 76(3), 614–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-01-2019-0013

Diamantopoulos, A., Szőcs, I., Florack, A., Kolbl, Ž., & Egger, M. (2021). The bond between country and brand stereotypes: Insights on the role of brand typicality and utilitarian/hedonic nature in enhancing stereotype content transfer. International Marketing Review, 38(6), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2020-0209

Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305

El Hedhli, K., Zourrig, H., Al Khateeb, A., & Alnawas, I. (2023). Stereotyping human-like virtual influencers in retailing: Does warmth prevail over competence?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103459

Eriksson, M. (2018). Lessons for crisis communication on social media: A systematic review of what research tells the practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(5), 526–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1510405

Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

Folkvord, F., Roes, E., & Bevelander, K. (2020). Promoting healthy foods in the new digital era on Instagram: An experimental study on the effect of a popular real versus fictitious fit influencer on brand attitude and purchase intentions. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09779-y

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Franke, C., Groeppel-Klein, A., & Müller, K. (2023). Consumers' responses to virtual influencers as advertising endorsers: Novel and effective or uncanny and deceiving?. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2154721

Ge, H., Wang, W., Wang, Y., & Tan, R. (2025). How does original equipment manufacturing brand disclosure affect purchase intention? The mediating role of brand competence and brand warmth. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 37(8), 2205–2227. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2024-0866

Gidaković, P., & Žabkar, V. (2022). The formation of consumers' warmth and competence impressions of corporate brands: The role of corporate associations. European Management Review, 19(4), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12509

Grover, S. L., Abid-Dupont, M. A., Manville, C., & Hasel, M. C. (2019). Repairing broken trust between leaders and followers: How violation characteristics temper apologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3509-3

Han, J., & Ko, D. (2025). Trust formation, error impact, and repair in human-AI financial advisory: A dynamic behavioral analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101370

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hu, Y., Min, H., & Su, N. (2021). How sincere is an apology? Recovery satisfaction in a robot service failure context. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(6), 1022–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211011533

Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut?. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/208538

Joel-Edgar, S., Chowdhury, S., Nagy, P., & Ren, S. (2025). Virtual influencers in social media versus the metaverse: Mind perception, blame judgements and brand trust. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115139

Khalfallah, D., & Keller, V. (2025). Authenticity, ethics, and transparency in virtual influencer marketing: A cross-cultural analysis of consumer trust and engagement: A systematic literature review. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105573

Kolbl, Ž., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2019). Stereotyping global brands: Is warmth more important than competence?. Journal of Business Research, 104, 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.060

Lombard, M., & Xu, K. (2021). Social responses to media technologies in the 21st century: The media are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 2, 29–55. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.2.2

Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501

Lou, C., Kiew, S. T. J., Chen, T., Lee, T. Y. M., Ong, J. E. C., & Phua, Z. (2023). Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641

Mahmood, A., & Huang, C. M. (2024). Gender biases in error mitigation by voice assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637337

Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246

Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. S. (2024). Does distrust in humans predict greater trust in AI? Role of individual differences in user responses to content moderation. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3638–3656. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221103534

Mrad, M., Ramadan, Z., Tóth, Z., Nasr, L., & Karimi, S. (2025). Virtual influencers versus real connections: Exploring the phenomenon of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising, 54(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2024.2393711

Muniz, F., Stewart, K., & Magalhães, L. (2024). Are they humans or are they robots? The effect of virtual influencer disclosure on brand trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(3), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2271

Nielsen, Y. A., Pfattheicher, S., & Keijsers, M. (2022). Prosocial behavior toward machines. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.004

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Rizzo, C., Baima, G., Janovská, K., & Bresciani, S. (2025). Navigating the uncertainty path of virtual influencers: Empirical evidence through a cultural lens. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123896

Roy, R., & Naidoo, V. (2021). Enhancing chatbot effectiveness: The role of anthropomorphic conversational styles and time orientation. Journal of Business Research, 126, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.051

Sands, S., Campbell, C. L., Plangger, K., & Ferraro, C. (2022). Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1721–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2019-0949

Shi, J., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Competence or warmth: Why do consumers pay for green advertising?. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(11), 2834–2857. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2023-0002

Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011

Song, M., Zhang, H., Xing, X., & Duan, Y. (2023). Appreciation vs. apology: Research on the influence mechanism of chatbot service recovery based on politeness theory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103323

Srinivasan, R., & Sarial-Abi, G. (2021). When algorithms fail: Consumers' responses to brand harm crises caused by algorithm errors. Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921997082

Stein, J.-P., Breves, P. L., & Anders, N. (2024). Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3433–3453. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221102900

Sung, B., Im, H., & Duong, V. C. (2023). Task type's effect on attitudes towards voice assistants. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(5), 1772–1790. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12946

Thomas, V. L., & Fowler, K. (2021). Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595

Toader, D. C., Boca, G., Toader, R., Măcelaru, M., Toader, C., Ighian, D., & Rădulescu, A. T. (2020). The effect of social presence and chatbot errors on trust. Sustainability, 12(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010256

Xu, Y., & Ling, I. L. (2026). Restoring trust: Gratitude vs. apology in healthcare service recovery. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 36(7), 46–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2025-0176

Yang, M. R., Pathak, S., & Huang, S. Z. (2025). Warmth and competence: An empirical investigation of the dual impact of corporate apologies on repairing brand trust. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 6(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2025-06-01-07

Yılmazdoğan, O. C., Doğan, R. Ş., & Altıntaş, E. (2021). The impact of the source credibility of Instagram influencers on travel intention: The mediating role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 27(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766721995973

Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: The roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

Zerilli, J., Bhatt, U., & Weller, A. (2022). How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence. Patterns, 3(4), 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100455

Zhang, Q., & Abdullah, F. (2026). Virtual vs. human influencers: AI-mediated trust transfer and brand attachment among female consumers. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(7), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21070209

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Selçuk Yasin Yıldız