Energy transition, government effectiveness and CO₂ emissions by income groups: Panel data evidence from an extended EKC approach
PDF (Turkish)

Keywords

Environmental Kuznets Curve, CO₂ Emissions, Renewable Energy, Income Groups

How to Cite

Energy transition, government effectiveness and CO₂ emissions by income groups: Panel data evidence from an extended EKC approach. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1265-1282. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2803

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of per capita CO₂ emissions across income groups for 140 countries over 2002–2021. The Environmental Kuznets Curve framework is extended by incorporating per capita income, squared income, renewable energy consumption, fossil fuel consumption, energy intensity, urbanization, and government effectiveness. Countries are classified into four World Bank income groups, and the model is estimated separately for the full sample and each group. Following diagnostic tests, a fixed-effects model with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors is employed. The results show that per capita income is positively associated with CO₂ emissions in all samples. The squared income term is negative and statistically significant only in the full sample and high-income group; however, estimated turning points largely lie outside observed income ranges. Renewable energy consumption is negatively associated with emissions, whereas fossil fuel consumption and energy intensity are positively associated. Overall, the findings indicate that environmental improvement cannot be expected from income growth alone and should be considered together with energy structure, energy efficiency, institutional capacity, and income-group heterogeneity.

Article Usage Statistics

Abstract views
158
PDF downloads
73
Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
PDF (Turkish)

References

Acaroğlu, H., Kartal, H. M., & García Márquez, F. P. (2023). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in terms of ecological footprint and CO₂ emissions through energy diversification for Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 63289–63304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26278-w

Almeida, D., Carvalho, L., Ferreira, P., Dionísio, A., & Ul Haq, I. (2024). Global dynamics of environmental Kuznets curve: A cross-correlation analysis of income and CO₂ emissions. Sustainability, 16(20), 9089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209089

Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer.

Das Gupta, S., Baudino, M., & Sarkar, S. (2025). Does the environmental Kuznets curve hold across sectors? Evidence from developing and emerging economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 211, 115201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115201

Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011

Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825

Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301

Hu, Y., Guan, K., & Wang, S. (2026). Challenging the environmental Kuznets curve in China: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model with cross-sectional dependence. Journal of Environmental Management, 398, 128432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128432

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/630421468336563314

Mahmoodi, M., & Dahmardeh, N. (2022). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis with considering ecological footprint and governance quality: Evidence from emerging countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 849676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.849676

Perman, R., & Stern, D. I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00216

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (CESifo Working Paper No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240).

Richmond, A. K., & Kaufmann, R. K. (2006). Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? Ecological Economics, 56(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.011

Saboori, B., Mahdavian, S. M., & Radmehr, R. (2024). Assessing the environmental impact of institutional quality at aggregate and disaggregate levels: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in MENA countries. Sustainable Environment, 10(1), 2426833. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2024.2426833

Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031

Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004

Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024). Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: The impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 292. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02736-9

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

World Bank. (2024a). World development indicators. World Bank. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ocak 2026. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

World Bank. (2024b). Worldwide governance indicators. World Bank. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ocak 2026. https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=worldwide-governance-indicators

Zaland, Z., & Imamoglu, H. (2024). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the context of renewable and non-renewable energy in China. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 12(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v12i2.2348

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Ökkeş Çelen- Taner Taş- Selim Baha Yıldız