Ticaret açıklığı, finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: Yeni sanayileşen ülkeler
Yayınlanmış 26.06.2023
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Ekonomik Büyüme, Ticaret Açıklığı, Finansal Gelişme
- Economic Growth, Trade Openness, Financial Development
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Burak Tuğberk Tosunoğlu
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Bir ülkenin finansal gelişmişliği ve ticari açıklığı, uluslararası düzeyde ekonomik sisteme entegrasyonu etkileyen önemli göstergelerdir. Özellikle yeni sanayileşen ülkeler açısından bu göstergeler ekonomik büyümenin sağlanmasında fayda sağlar. Finansal gelişme, sermayenin mobilize edilmesi ve etkin kullanımı yoluyla ekonomik kalkınmayı destekler. Ticari açıklık, verimlilik ve ekonomik büyümenin birleştirici güçlerinden biridir. Ticari açıklığın etkinliği büyük ölçüde yapısal reformlara bağlıdır. Yeni sanayileşmiş ülkeler, küresel ekonomiden büyük miktarlarda sermaye ve yatırım çekmek için çalışan ülkelerdir. Bu ülkeler sanayileşmelerini sağlarken ihracatı teşvik etme eğilimindedirler. Bu çalışma, yeni sanayileşen on ülke için 1990'dan 2020'ye kadar olan verileri kullanarak ticaret açıklığı, finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Analizlerde Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel nedensellik testi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, finansal gelişmeden ticaret açıklığına ve ticaret açıklığından ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Çift yönlü ilişki finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasında bulunmaktadır.
Referanslar
- Anwar, S. and Sun, S. (2011). Financial development, foreign investment and economic growth in Malaysia, Journal of Asian Economics, 22, pp. 335-342.
- Appiah, M., Gyamfi, B.A., Adebayo, T.S., Bekun, F.V. (2023). Do financial development, foreign direct investment, and economic growth enhance industrial development? Fresh evidence from Sub‑Sahara African countries, Portuguese Economic Journal (22), pp. 203–22.
- Beck, T. (2002). Financial development and international trade: Is there a link? Journal of International Economics, 57(1), pp. 107–131.
- Beck, T., and Levine, R. (2004). Stock markets, banks, and growth: Panel evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28 (3), pp. 423-442.
- Bourdon, M., Mouél, C. and Vıjıl, M. (2013). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: some new insights on the openness measurement issue. Hall- Archives, Ouvertes, pp. 1-18.
- Chhabra, M., Giri, A.K., and Kuma, A. (2023). What shapes economic growth in brics? exploring the role of institutional quality and trade openness. The Economic Society of Australia. pp.1-19
- Chang, R., Kaltani, L. and Loayza, N., (2009). Openness can be good for growth: the role of policy complementarities, Journal of Development Economics, (90), No:1, pp. 33-49.
- Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Levine, R. (2008). Finance, financial sector policies, and long-run growth. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4469. World Bank.
- Demetriades, P. O. and Hussein, K. A. (1996). Does financial development cause economic growth? Time-series evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), pp. 387-411.
- Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Levine, R. (2001). Financial structures and economic growth: A cross-country comparison of banks, markets, and development. MIT Press.
- Din, M., Ghani, E. and Siddique, O. (2003). Openness and economic growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), pp. 795–807.
- Dinga, G.D., Fonchamnyo, D.C., Ongo, N.B.E. and Bekun, F.C. (2023). Dynamic common correlation effects of financia ldevelopment, foreign direct investment, market size and trade openness on domestic investment: anincome-level prognosis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. pp.1026-4116
- Dong-Hyeon, K., Shu-Chin L. and Yu-Bo S., Dynamic effects of trade openness on financial development, Economic Modelling, Volume 27, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 254-261.
- Dumitrescu, E. I., and Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29 (4): pp. 1450-1460.
- Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity, and growth: What do we really know? The Economic Journal, 108 (447), pp. 383-398.
- Kumari, R., Shabbir, M.S., Saleem, S., Khan, G.Y., Abbasi, B.A., and Lopez, L.B (2023). An empirical analysis among foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: evidence from the Indian economy, South Asian Journal of Business Studies Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 127-149
- Levine, R., N. Loayza and T. Beck (2000), Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, Volume 46(1), pp. 31-77.
- Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (2), pp. 688-726.
- McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development, DC: The Brookings Institution
- Menyah, Y., Ş. Nazlioglu and Wolde-Rufael, K. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in african countries: new insights from a panel causality approach, Economic Modelling, 37, pp. 386-394.
- Mtar, K. and Belazreg, W. (2021). Causal nexus between innovation, financial development, and economic growth: the case of OECD countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, pp. 310–341.
- Mustafa, G. (2023). The Dynamic Relationship Between Financial Development, Economic Growth,
- Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness: Evidence from South Asian Countries, Millennial Asia
- pp 1–28.
- Parente, S., & Prescott, E. C. (1994). Barriers to technology adoption and development. Journal of Political Economy, 102 (2), pp. 298-321.
- Osei, M. J. and Kim, J, (2023). Financial development and the growth effect of foreign direct investment: does one size fit all?, International Economics, Volume 173, pp. 276-283
- Pesaran M. H., Smith, L. V. and Yamagata, T. (2013). Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 175, pp. 94– 115.
- Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., and Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), pp. 105-127.
- Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435.
- Pesaran, M.H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, pp. 265-312.
- Raghutla, C. (2020). The effect of trade openness on economic growth: some empirical evidence from emerging market economies, Journal of Public Affairs, 20(3), pp. 1-8.
- Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88 (3), pp. 559-586.
- Rani, R., and Kumar, N. (2018). Panel data analysis of financial development, trade openness, and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS countries. Emerging Economy Studies, 4(1), pp. 1–18.
- Liman, Y.S. and Sönmez, F.E. (2022). Ticaret savaşlarının dünya ekonomisi üzerindeki etkileri: ampirik bir analiz. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences 2022; (20), pp. 123-140
- Schumpeter J.A. (1911). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
- Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development, Oxford University Press.
- Wacziarg, R. (2001). Measuring the dynamic gains from trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15 (3), pp. 393-429.
- Waugh, D. (2000). Manufacturing industries (chapter 19). World development, pp. 563-576.
- Zhang, J., Wang, L. and Wang, S. (2012). Financial development and economic growth: Recent evidence from China, Journal of Comparative Economics, 40 (3), pp. 393-412.