Referanslar

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
3. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3
4. Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/675737
5. Bernick, M. (2015, March). What Goodreads’ explosive growth means for writers and the broader economy [online], https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelbernick/2017/03/15/ what-goodreads-explosive-growth-means-for-writers-and-the- broader-economy/#58da50751d6a [Date Accessed: September 26, 2022].
6. Betsch, C., Renkewitz, F., & Haase, N. (2013). Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions: A simulation of an online patient social network. Medical Decision Making, 33(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12452342
7. Brosius, H.-B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21(1), 48–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021001004
8. Cesmeci, C. (2017). The role of music in persuasion: An evolutionary approach. [Master’s dissertation, İstanbul Bilgi University].
9. Changchit, C., Klaus, T., & Lonkani, R. (2022). Online Reviews: What Drives Consumers to Use Them. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1779149
10. Chatterjee, P. (2001), Online reviews: Do consumers use them?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 28 (Eds), Mary C. Gilly and Joan Meyers-Levy, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 129-133.
11. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
12. Chintagunta, P. K., Gopinath, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29(5), 944–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0572
13. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8
14. Daschmann, G. (2008). Exemplification and exemplars, effects of. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (p. wbiece050). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiece050
15. De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2016). Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv047
16. Evrard, Y., & Krebs, A. (2018). The authenticity of the museum experience in the digital age: The case of the Louvre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9309-x
17. Fedewa, D., Holder, C., Teichner, W., & Wiseman, B. (2021, August). Five-star growth: Using online ratings to design better products [online], https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/five-star-growth-using-online-ratings-to-design-better-products [Date Accessed: September 26, 2022].
18. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0193
19. Freedman, L. (2008, February) Merchant and customer perspectives on customer reviews and user-generated content [online], The E-tailing Group Inc., http://www.e-tailing.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008_WhitePaper_0204_4FINAL-powerreviews.pdf 2008 [Date Accessed: September 27, 2022].
20. Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
21. Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
22. Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021005003
23. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103(3), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592
24. Gilead, M., Liberman, N., & Maril, A. (2014). From mind to matter: Neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst031
25. Grayson, K., & Martinec, R. (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/422109
26. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G., Gremler, D.D. (2004), Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
27. Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044293
28. Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L. (2013). The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0011
29. Hoffart, J. C., Olschewski, S., & Rieskamp, J. (2019). Reaching for the star ratings: A Bayesian-inspired account of how people use consumer ratings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.02.008
30. Hofmann, J., Clement, M., Völckner, F., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2017). Empirical generalizations on the impact of stars on the economic success of movies. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.08.006
31. Humphreys, A., Isaac, M. S., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2021). Construal matching in online search: Applying text analysis to illuminate the consumer decision journey. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(6), 1101–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720940693
32. Kaemingk, D. (2020, October). Online reviews statistics to know in 2022 [online], https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/online-review-stats/ [Date Accessed: September 26, 2022].
33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582
35. Kaleta, J. P., & Aasheim, C. (2022). Construal of Social Relationships in Online Consumer Reviews. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2054479
36. Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020). The Influence of Authenticity of Online Reviews on Trust Formation among Travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 59(5), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519868307
37. King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
38. Klaus, P. (2013). The case of Amazon.com: Towards a conceptual framework of online customer service experience (OCSE) using the emerging consensus technique (ECT). Journal of Services Marketing, 27(6), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2012-0030
39. Koiso-Kanttila, N. (2005). Time, attention, authenticity and consumer benefits of the Web. Business Horizons, 48(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.004
40. Kozinets, R. V. (2016). Amazonian forests and trees: Multiplicity and objectivity in studies of online consumer-generated ratings and reviews, a commentary on de Langhe, Fernbach, and Lichtenstein. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv090
41. Lee, S., & Choeh, J. Y. (2020). Using the social influence of electronic word-of-mouth for predicting product sales: The moderating effect of review or reviewer helpfulness and product type. Sustainability, 12(19), 7952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197952
42. Lermer, E., Streicher, B., Sachs, R., Raue, M., & Frey, D. (2015). The effect of construal level on risk-taking: Construal level and risk. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2067
43. Li, X., Wu, C., & Mai, F. (2019). The effect of online reviews on product sales: A joint sentiment-topic analysis. Information & Management, 56(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.04.007
44. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
45. Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8
46. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70017-7
47. Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Lu, C. Y. (2015). Authenticity perceptions, brand equity and brand choice intention: The case of ethnic restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 50, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.008
48. Lyon, D., & Slovic, P. (1976). Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimation. Acta Psychologica, 40(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(76)90032-9
49. McCrea, S. M., Wieber, F., & Myers, A. L. (2012). Construal level mind-sets moderate self- and social stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026108
50. Mudambi, S. M. & Schuff, D. (2010). Research note: What Makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420
51. Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & Norton, D. A. (2011). Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.617
52. Ngarmwongnoi, C., Oliveira, J. S., AbedRabbo, M., & Mousavi, S. (2020). The implications of eWOM adoption on the customer journey. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3450
53. Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee Ross (1980), Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54. Ordabayeva, N., Cavanaugh, L. A., & Dahl, D. W. (2022). The upside of negative: Social distance in online reviews of identity-relevant brands. Journal of Marketing, 002224292210747. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221074704
55. Ozanne, M., Liu, S. Q., & Mattila, A. S. (2019). Are attractive reviewers more persuasive? Examining the role of physical attractiveness in online reviews. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2096
56. Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). Born unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.05.002
57. Park, D.-H., & Lee, J. (2008). EWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.11.004
58. Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405
59. Perloff, R.M. (2010). The Dynamics of persuasion; communication and attitudes in the 21st century. NY: Routledge.
60. Peter, C., & Brosius, H.-B. (2010). Grenzen der wirksamkeit von fallbeispielen? [Limits of effectiveness of exemplars?]. Publizistik, 55, 275–288.
61. Pizzi, G., Marzocchi, G. L., Orsingher, C., & Zammit, A. (2015). The temporal construal of customer satisfaction. Journal of Service Research, 18(4), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515584752
62. Powell, D., Yu, J., DeWolf, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2017). the love of large numbers: A popularity bias in consumer choice. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1432–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617711291
63. Power Reviews (2020, April). Market trends snapshot – April 2020 [online], https://www.powerreviews.com/insights/impact-consumer-ratings-covid-19/ [Date Accessed: September 26, 2022].
64. Power Reviews (2021). Survey: The ever-growing power of -reviews [online], https://www.powerreviews.com/insights/power-of-reviews-survey-2021/ [Date Accessed: September 26, 2022].
65. Qiu, L., Pang, J., & Lim, K. H. (2012). Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.020
66. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.003
67. Raue, M., Streicher, B., Lermer, E., & Frey, D. (2015). How far does it feel? Construal level and decisions under risk. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.005
68. Richins, M. L. & Root-Shaffer, T. (1988). The role of evolvement and opinion leadership in consumer word-of-mouth: An implicit model made explicit. In Micheal J. Houston (Ed.), NA - Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 15 (pp. 32-36). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
69. Rynarzewska, A. I. (2019). It’s not fake, it’s biased: Insights into morality of incentivized reviewers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2018-2570
70. Saad, G. (2017). On the method of evolutionary psychology and its applicability to consumer research. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0645
71. Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.364
72. Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2016). Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems, 81, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.006
73. Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2016). Stars, votes, and badges: how online badges affect hotel reviewers. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1064056
74. Solomon, M. R. (1986). The missing link: Surrogate consumers in the marketing chain. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298605000406
75. Spassova, G., & Lee, A. Y. (2013). Looking into the future: A Match between self-view and temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/669145
76. Stillman, P. E., Lee, H., Deng, X., Unnava, H. R., Cunningham, W. A., & Fujita, K. (2017). Neurological evidence for the role of construal level in future-directed thought. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx022
77. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2001), Using multivariate statistics, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
78. The Nielsen Company (2015, September). Global trust in advertising: Winning strategies for an evolving media landscape. https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/global-trust-in-advertising-report-sept-2015-1.pdf.
79. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
80. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
81. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
82. Trope, Yaacov L. (2012). Construal Level Theory. In P. K. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 118-134). Washington DC: Sage Publications.
83. Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (1989). Levels of personal agency: individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.
84. Van Laer, T., Edson Escalas, J., Ludwig, S., & van den Hende, E. A. (2019). What happens in vegas stays on tripadvisor? A theory and technique to understand narrativity in consumer reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, ucy067. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy067
85. Varnali, K., & Cesmeci, C. (2022). Customer responses to service failures on social media. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(5), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2020-0484
86. Wakefield, L. T., & Wakefield, R. L. (2018). Anxiety and ephemeral social media use in negative ewom creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.09.005
87. Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02250.x
88. Wang, J., Hong, J., & Zhou, R. (2018). How long did i wait? The effect of construal levels on consumers’ wait duration judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx117
89. Welsh, M. B., & Navarro, D. J. (2012). Seeing is believing: Priors, trust, and base rate neglect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.001
90. Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2013). The influence of base rate and case information on health-risk perceptions: A unified model of self-positivity and self-negativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1086/666596
91. Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.10
92. Zheng, L. (2021). The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework. Journal of Business Research, 135, 226–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.038
93. Zhu, L., Yin, G., & He, W. (2014). Is this opinion leader’s review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 367-280.
94. Ziegele, M., & Weber, M. (2015). Example, please! Comparing the effects of single customer reviews and aggregate review scores on online shoppers’ product evaluations: Example, please! Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1503