Cilt 5 Sayı 3 (2017): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Makaleler

BİLGİ YÖNETİMİ: ARAŞTIRMA EĞİLİMLERİNE GENEL BAKIŞ

PDF (English)
  • Burcu KÖR,
  • Meltem MUTLUTÜRK
Burcu KÖR
Boğaziçi University
Biyografi
Meltem MUTLUTÜRK
Boğaziçi University
Biyografi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i3.127

Yayınlanmış 2017-12-19

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Bilgi Yönetimi,
  • Bilgi Yönetimi Çerçevesi,
  • Araştırma Eğilimleri

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KÖR, B., & MUTLUTÜRK, M. (2017). BİLGİ YÖNETİMİ: ARAŞTIRMA EĞİLİMLERİNE GENEL BAKIŞ. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i3.127

Özet

Genç ve disiplinlerarası bir alan olan Bilgi Yönetimi (BY), bilimsel araştırmalarda ve bilgiye dayalı ekonomilerin geliştirilmesinde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu çalışma BY literatürünü dikkatle gözden geçirerek, BY araştırma eğilimlerini içeren çalışmalarda kullanılan yöntemleri ve bunların BY disiplinine katkısını ayrıntılı olarak incelemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacını, BY atıf klasiklerinin ve bunların temel özelliklerinin incelenmesiyle mevcut BY araştırma eğilimlerinin ve atıf analizleri sonuçları doğrultusunda bütüncül bir BY çerçevesinin belirlenmesi oluşturmaktadır.  Bu çalışmada, 2010 ile 2014 yılları arasında akademik hakemli dergilerde yayınlanan 152 makale incelenmiştir. Bu incelemelerin sonucunda, bütüncül bir BY çerçevesi geliştirilerek BY alanında konsensüs oluşturmasına katkı sağlaması hedeflenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, BY makalelerinin kapsamının oldukça geniş kavram, disiplin ve çevreden oluştuğunu göstermektedir.

PDF (English)

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of management review, 21(1), 254-285.
  2. Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R., Fataliyev, T., & Hasanova, R. (2015). An aggregated index for assessment of the scientific output of researchers. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 6(1), 31-62.
  3. Bassi, L. J. (1997). Harnessing the power of intellectual capital. Training & Development, 51(12), 25-31.
  4. Bayram, Ö. G. (1998). Atıf verisi (citation data) ve enformetrik yasalar: Türk kütüphanecilik literatüründeki doktora tezleri üzerinde bir uygulama. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 12(1), 21-32.
  5. Bedford, D. A., & Lewis, J. (2015). Introduction to the Special Issue: Knowledge Management Models and Theories. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 14(04), 1502002.
  6. Bijker, W., & Hughes, T. P. Trevor Pinch, eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems.
  7. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346-359.
  8. Chauvel, D., & Despres, C. (2002). A review of survey research in knowledge management: 1997-2001. Journal of knowledge management, 6(3), 207-223.
  9. Clark, T. (2004). The fashion of management fashion: a surge too far?. Organization., 11(2), 297-306.
  10. Coursaris, C. K., & Van Osch, W. (2014). A scientometric analysis of social media research (2004–2011). Scientometrics, 101(1), 357-380.
  11. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. MIT Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43.
  13. De Jarnett, L (1996). Knowledge the latest thing. Information Strategy, The Executives Journal, 12 (pt 2), 3-5.
  14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Venkitachalam, K., Sharif, A. M., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2011). Research trends in knowledge management: Analyzing the past and predicting the future. Information Systems Management, 28(1), 43-56.
  15. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
  16. Fincham, R., & Roslender, R. (2003). Intellectual capital accounting as management fashion: a review and critique. European accounting review, 12(4), 781-795.
  17. Frappaolo, C., & Toms, W. (1997). Knowledge Management: from terra incognita to terra firma. The Delphi Group.
  18. Fteimi, N. (2015). Analyzing the Literature on Knowledge Management Frameworks: Towards a Normative Knowledge Management Classification Schema.
  19. Fteimi, N., & Basten, D. (2015, May). Impact of Dictionaries on Automated Content Analysis-The Use of Compound Concepts in Analysing Knowledge Management Research. In Proceedings of Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany.
  20. Garfield, E. (1977). Introducing citation classics-human side of scientific reports.
  21. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 295(1), 90-93.
  22. Giaglis, G. M. (2003). Directions and trends in knowledge management research: Results from an empirical analysis of European projects. Knowledge and business process management, 1.
  23. Girard, J., & Girard, J. (2015). Defining knowledge management: Toward an applied compendium. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 1-20.
  24. Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.
  25. Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management-comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of knowledge management, 13(4), 4-31.
  26. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 16569-16572.
  27. Hislop,D.(2010).Knowledge management as an ephemeral management fashion?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 779-790.
  28. Hlupic, V., Pouloudi, A., & Rzevski, G. (2002). Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management:‘hard’,‘soft’and ‘abstract’issues. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(2), 90-102.
  29. Kevork, E. K., & Vrechopoulos, A. P. (2009). CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(1), 48-85.
  30. Kinney AL (2007) National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 17943–17947.
  31. Kör, Burcu (in press). Revealing Trends in Knowledge Management Research: From 2010 to 2016, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitisü.
  32. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (1998). Management Information Systems: Nes Approaches to Organization and Technology. Prentice hall.
  33. Lee, C.C. and Yang, J. (2000), “Knowledge value chain”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 19 No. 9, pp. 783-94.
  34. Lee, M. R., & Chen, T. T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 28, 47-58.
  35. Leydesdorff, L. (1989). The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies: introduction to the topical issue. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 333-347.
  36. Linstone, H. A. (1984). Multiple perspectives for decision making; bridging the gap between analysis and action, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., New York
  37. Linstone, H. A. (1999). Decision making for technology executives: using multiple perspectives to improved performance. Artech House on Demand.
  38. Lipetz, B. A. (1999). Aspects of JASIS authorship through five decades. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 50(11), 994.
  39. Malhotra, Y. (1998). Tooks@ work: Deciphering the knowledge management hype. The journal for quality and participation, 21(4), 58.
  40. Merton, R. K. (1988), The Matthew effect in science, 2: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79 (299)
  41. Mishra, B., & Uday Bhaskar, A. (2011). Knowledge management process in two learning organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 344-359.
  42. Mitroff, I. I., & Linstone, H. A. (1993). Unbounded Mind, Oxford University Press: New York. Nakamoto, H. (1988). Synchronous and diachronous citation distribution.
  43. Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. Mis Quarterly, 1-18.
  44. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics/theory, practice and problems. Evaluation review, 18(1), 65-76.
  45. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
  46. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creation company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press. New York, USA, 304.
  47. Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization science, 20(3), 635-652.
  48. Pawlowski, J. M., & Bick, M. (2015). The global knowledge management framework: Towards a theory for knowledge management in globally distributed settings. Leading Issues in Knowledge Management, Volume Two, 2, 134.
  49. Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge management: a strategic agenda. Long range planning, 30(3), 385-391.
  50. Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2012). A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions. PLoS One, 7(3).
  51. Romano Jr, N. C., & Fjermestad, J. (2001). Electronic commerce customer relationship management: An assessment of research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 61-113.
  52. Safer, M. A., & Tang, R. (2009). The psychology of referencing in psychology journal articles. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 51-53.
  53. Scarbrough, H. (2002). The role of intermediary groups in shaping management fashion: The case of knowledge management. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(4), 87-103.
  54. Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: the role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12(1), 3-12.
  55. Scarbrough, H., Robertson, M., & Swan, J. (2005). Professional media and management fashion: The case of knowledge management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(2), 197-208.
  56. Seleim, A. A., & Khalil, O. E. (2011). Understanding the knowledge management-intellectual capital relationship: a two-way analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 586-614.
  57. Sengupta, I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview. Libri, 42(2), 75-98.
  58. Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 4-15.
  59. Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307-326.
  60. Serenko, A., & Dumay, J. (2015a). Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 401-431.
  61. Serenko, A., & Dumay, J. (2015b). Citation classics published in Knowledge Management journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1335-1355.
  62. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3-23.
  63. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253-280.
  64. Singh Sandhawalia, B., & Dalcher, D. (2011). Developing knowledge management capabilities: a structured approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 313-328.
  65. Small, H. (2004). On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics, 60(1), 71-79.
  66. Taylor, K. (1997). Knowledge management and human resources. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(3), 485-491.
  67. Turpin, M., Phahlamohlaka, J., & Marais, M. (2009, May). The multiple perspectives approach as a framework to analyze social systems in a developing country context. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 26-28).
  68. Tzortzaki, A. M., & Mihiotis, A. (2014). A review of knowledge management theory and future directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(1), 29-41.
  69. Van Rossem, A., & Van Veen, K. (2011). Managers’ awareness of fashionable management concepts: An empirical study. European Management Journal, 29(3), 206-216