Referanslar

1. Alam, M. A. (2016). Techno-stress and productivity: Survey evidence from the aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 50, 62-70.
2. Alqatawenh, A. S. (2018). Transformational leadership style and its relationship with change management. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 17-24.
3. Andersen, J. A. (1995). Leadership and leadership theories – about what answers the leadership research can give. Oslo: Bedriftsøkonomens Forlag A/S.
4. Arnetz, B. B. & Wiholm, C. (1997). Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35-42
5. Attar, M. (2014). Üst düzey yöneticilerin liderlik özelliklerinin örgütsel ustalık düzeyine etkisi: Türk bankacılık sektörü üzerine bir araştırma (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
6. Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A. & Yammarino F. J. (1991). Leading in the 1990’s: The four i’s of transformational leadership. Journal European Industrial Training, 15(4), 9-16.
7. Ayyagari, R., Varun, G. & Russell, P. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. Management Information Systems, 35(4), 831-859.
8. Barling, J., Christie A. & Turner N. (2008). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 851-861.
9. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. The International Journal of Public Administration, 17(3), 541-554.
10. Bass, B. M. & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill`s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. New York: The Free Press.
11. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.
12. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. & Atwater, L. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology, 45(1), 5-34.
13. Boyer-Davis, S. (2018). The relationship between technology stress and leadership style: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 8(1), 48-65.
14. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
16. Califf, C.B., Sarker, S., Sarker, S. & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). The bright and dark sides of technostress: An empirical study of healthcare workers. Thirty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth in (pp. 1-13). Texas: USA
17. Carlson, D. S. & Perrewe, P. L. (1995). Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 829-838.
18. Chiappetta, M. (2017). The technostress: Definition, symptoms and risk prevention. Senses and Sciences, 4(1), 358-361.
19. Çetin, D. (2017). Okul yöneticilerinin teknostres algıları ile bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Edirne ili örneği) (Unpublished master thesis), Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Edirne.
20. Çicek, B. & Kılınç, E. (2020). Teknostresin presenteizm ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisinde dönüşümcü liderliğin aracı rolü. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(2), 555-570.
21. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297-316.
22. Doğrular, M. M. (2019). Teknostresin verimlilik üzerine etkisi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
23. Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in a revolutionary process. New York: Free Press.
24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
26. George, R., Chiba, M. & Scheepers, C. B. (2017). An investigation into the effect of leadership style on stress-related presenteeism in South African knowledge workers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(0), 1-13.
27. Gomes, A. R. (2014). Transformational leadership: Theory, research, and application to sports. In C. Mohiyeddini (Ed.), Contemporary topics and trends in the psychology of sports (pp. 53-114). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
28. Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J. & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750-770.
29. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). New York: Sage publications.
30. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
31. Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis?. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 1-8.
33. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
34. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
35. Hırlak, B. & Kara, E. (2018). Organizational change and Leadership. In Ö. Özçelik (Ed.) Studies on Interdisciplinary Economics and Business – Volume I, (255-269 pp.), Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
36. Ilgaz, G., Özgür, H. ve Çuhadar, C. (2016). The adaptation of technostress scale into Turkish. 11th International Balkan Education and Science Congress, Poreč, Croatia.
37. Karip, Y . (1998). Dönüşümcü liderlik . Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi , 16(16), 443-465 .
38. Khan, A., Rehman, H. & Rehman S.(2013). An empirical analysis of correlation between technostress and job satisfaction: A case of KPK, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science. 13, 9-15.
39. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
40. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJEC), 11(4), 1-10.
41. Kotter, J. P (1990). What leaders really do?. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 103-111.
42. Kouzes, J. & B. Posner. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
43. La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), 13–35.
44. Larson, A. (1968). The president nobody knew. New York: Popular Library.
45. Larsson, J. & Vinberg, S. (2010) Leadership behaviour in successfulorganisations: Universal or situation-dependent?. Total Quality Management, 21(3), 317-334.
46. Michael A. P. (2008). Emotional intelligence and critical thinking relationships to transformational leadership (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University on Phoenix, North America.
47. Munir, F., Nielsen, K. & Carneiro, I. G. (2010). Transformational leadership and depressive symptoms: A prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 120(1), 235–239.
48. Okebaram & Moses, S. (2013). Minimizing the effects of technostress in today’s organization. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3, 649-658.
49. Romero, L. M., Platts S. H., Schoech S. J., Wada, H., Crespi, E., Martin, L. B. & Buck, C. L. (2015) Understanding stress in the healthy animal—potential paths for progress. Stress, 18(5), 491–497
50. Sashkin, M. & Rosenbach W. E. (1993). A new leadership paradigm. Contemporary Issues in Leadership, 3, 87-108.
51. Streukens, S. & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European Management Journal, 34(6), 618-632.
52. Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan B. S. & Ragu-Nathan T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
53. Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289
54. Tichy, N. M. & Devanna M. A. (1986). The transformational leader, USA: Wiley Press.
55. Variya, P. B. Patel, N. K. (2020). Technostress: A conceptual framework. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(23), 492-495.
56. Waldman, D., Bass B. M. & Yammarion, R. (1990). Adding to contingent-reward behavior: The augmenting effects of charismatic leadership. Group and Organizational Studies. 15(4), 381-394.
57. Yıldız, F. (2013). Yöneticilerin algılanan sahte ve gerçek dönüşümcü liderlik davranışlarını ayırt etmede makyavelizm ile kişisel açılım ve geri bildirimin etkileri (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
58. Yuvaraj, M. & Singh, A. K. (2015). Effects and measures of technostress among librarians in selected university libraries of Delhi. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-13.