Vol. 8 No. 5 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VARIABLES: A RESEARCH ON SMEs

Arif DAMAR
Res. Asisst., Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University
Rıfat İRAZ
Prof. Dr., Selçuk University

Published 2020-12-25

Keywords

  • Entelektüel Sermaye,
  • Rekabet Avantajı,
  • KOBİ'ler
  • Intellectual Capital,
  • Competitive Advantage,
  • SMEs

How to Cite

DAMAR, A., & İRAZ, R. (2020). RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VARIABLES: A RESEARCH ON SMEs. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(5), 4487-4520. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i5.1653

Abstract

  1. LITERATURE

 

  • RESEARCH SUBJECT

Knowledge is an essential element that directly affects the activities of organisations, facilitates organisations to follow new markets and technological trends and enables the development of innovative culture in enterprises (Eskiler et al., 2011: 40).  Therefore, intellectual capital plays a vital role in creating and maintaining a competitive advantage for researchers in the field of strategic management (Kong and Prior, 2008: 119).  Besides, in line with the future vision of the enterprises, the intellectual capital that adds value to the enterprises (Rastogi, 2003: 230) is seen as the most valuable asset and the most potent competitive weapon in the business world (Wang and Chang, 2005: 222)

Intellectual capital which is the antecedent of the performance and competitive advantage (Nzewi et al., 2019: 29), is one of the primary resources that provide national and global growth and profitability(F‐Jardón and Martos, 2009: 600; Yaseen et al., 2016: 169). However, intellectual capital is a more critical source of competitive advantage in small and medium-sized enterprises compared to large companies. Because SMEs have fewer financial resources, in competing with their competitors through intangible resources (Jardon and Martos, 2012: 463).

It is noteworthy that various studies have been conducted in different countries (such as India, Taiwan, Uganda, Jordan, etc.) to determine the effects of intellectual capital on competitive advantage (Chahal and Bakshi, 2015; Chen, 2008; Kamukama and Sulait, 2017; Malkawi et al., 2018; Yaseen et al., 2016).  These studies have been conducted on newly created firms (Hormiga et al., 2011), small and medium-sized enterprises (Chen, 2008), private and public banks (Chahal and Bakshi, 2015), microfinance enterprises (Kamukama et al., 2011; Kamukama and Sulait, 2017), telecommunications (Yaseen et al., 2016), and pharmaceutical companies (Malkawi et al., 2018), and each study concluded that intellectual capital has positive effect on competitive advantage.

  • RESEARCH PURPOSE AND IMPORTANCE

This study aims to examine the effect of intellectual capital levels of enterprises with 10-249 employees (SMEs) on competitive advantage and to investigate the language equivalent and the validity and reliability of the level of intellectual capital and competitive advantages of SMEs in Turkey.

  • CONTRIBUTION of the ARTICLE to the LITERATURE

It is expected that examining the effect of intellectual capital on competitive advantage in SMEs and adapting the scales of intellectual capital and competitive advantage into Turkish will contribute to the literature.

  1. DESIGN AND METHOD                                 

 

  • RESEARCH TYPE

This article is a research article.

 

  • RESEARCH QUESTION

The research question was determined as "Do the intellectual capital levels of SMEs affect their competitive advantage?".

  • DATA COLLECTION METHOD

In this study, which is empirical research, survey technique was used as the data collection tool. Employees working as managers at SMEs in Turkey constitute the sample of the study. In this context, data were obtained from 130 participants determined by convenience sampling method.

  • QUANTITATIVE / QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

In this study, descriptive statistics, independent groups t-test, explanatory and confirmatory factor and path analyses were used.     

  • RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

       This research hypothesis was determined as follows;

H1: Intellectual capital has a positive effect on competitive advantage.

H1a: Human capital has a positive effect on competitive advantage.

H1b: Social capital has a positive effect on competitive advantage.

H1c: Organisational capital has a positive effect on competitive advantage.

  1. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

According to the results of analysis; intellectual capital has a statistically significant positive effect on competitive advantage (r= 0,675, p <0.000). Human capital and organisational capital positively affect competitive advantage, but social capital has not been determined to have a significant effect on competitive advantage. In this context, H1a and H1c hypotheses were accepted. Also, in the literature, it was determined that human capital, social capital and organisational capital, which are sub-dimensions of intellectual capital, have a positive effect on competitive advantage (Chahal and Bakshi, 2015; Chen, 2008; Kamukama and Sulait, 2017; Malkawi et al., 2018; Taie, 2014). However, Yaseen et al.(2016) have found a positive effect of social capital and organisational capital on competitive advantage. Hormiga et al.(2011) found positive effects of human capital and social capital on competitive advantage in their study.        

  1. CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATION AND LIMITATIONS

It was determined that Intellectual Capital Scale and Competitive Advantage Scale are valid and reliable measurement tools that can be used in different methods and applications in Turkey. Besides, intellectual capital has a statistically significant and positive effect on the competitive advantage of SMEs. The main limitation of this study is that the convenience sampling method was preferred during the sampling process, and the data were collected using both face-to-face and online questionnaires from SMEs. In this context, expanding the field of activity of SMEs in future studies and including the foreign sample in the research will make the research findings more significant. Besides, examining the subject with different variables will contribute to the field and practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agha, S., Alrubaiee, L. ve Jamhour, M. (2012). Effect of core competence on competitive advantage and organizational performance. International journal of business and management, 7(1), 192-204.
  2. Akkaya, B. ve Balı, S. (2018). Entelektüel sermaye ve ölçümüne yönelik bazı yaklaşımlar. Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 1145-1161.
  3. Allard, K. (2003). Business as war: Battling for competitive advantage. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Anwar, M., Khan, S. Z. ve Khan, N. U. (2018). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial strategy and new ventures performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. Business and Economic Review, 10(1), 63-93.
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. ve Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative science quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
  7. Bayraktar, Y. ve Kaya, H. İ. (2016). Yeni ekonomi ve değişen rekabet anlayışı: karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 11(1), 89-106.
  8. Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K. ve Roos, G. (1999). The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 17(4), 391-402.
  9. Bozbura, F. T. ve Toraman, A. (2010). Türkiye'de entelektüel sermayenin ölçülmesi ile ilgili model çalışması ve bir uygulama. İTÜDERGİSİ/d, 3(1), 55-66.
  10. Brunelle, E. ve Lapierre, J. (2007). Examining the relationship between individual characteristics, product characteristics, and media Richness fit on consumer channel preference. Paper presented at the International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies.
  11. Chahal, H. ve Bakshi, P. (2014). Effect of intellectual capital on competitive advantage and business performance: Role of innovation and learning culture. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 52-70.
  12. Chahal, H. ve Bakshi, P. (2015). Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: Role of innovation and organizational learning. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(3), 376-399.
  13. Chen, J., Zhu, Z. ve Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study. Journal of intellectual capital, 5(1), 195-212.
  14. Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of business ethics, 77(3), 271-286.
  15. Coyne, K. P. (1986). Sustainable competitive advantage—What it is, what it isn't. Business horizons, 29(1), 54-61.
  16. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (5. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  17. Demirel, E. T. ve Demir, Y. (2011). Rekabet avantajı yaratmada entelektüel sermayenin önemi. "İş, Güç" Endüstri İlişkileri Ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 13(1), 81-104. doi:10.4026/1303-2860.2010.0166.x
  18. Doğan, İ. ve Özdamar, K. (2017). The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(9), 7525-7533.
  19. Dönmez, A. ve Erol, İ. (2016). Entelektüel sermayenin ölçülmesi: VAIC™ yöntemi yardımıyla Bist-Sürdürülebilirlik endeksi işletmeleri üzerine bir uygulama. Mali Cozum Dergisi/Financial Analysis(138), 27-56.
  20. Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long range planning, 30(3), 366-373.
  21. Edvinsson, L. ve Kivikas, M. (2007). Intellectual capital (IC) or Wissensbilanz process: some German experiences. Journal of intellectual capital, 8(3), 376-385.
  22. Edvinsson, L. ve Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356-364.
  23. Eskiler, E. ve Altunişik, R. (2017). Rol model alma davranışının pozitif sözlü iletişim ve satın alma niyeti üzerine etkisinde marka bağlılığının aracılık rolü. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(13), 687-696.
  24. Eskiler, E., Küçükibiş, F., Gülle, M. ve Soyer, F. (2016). Bilişsel davranışçı fiziksel aktivite ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 2577-2587.
  25. Eskiler, E., Özmen, M. ve Uzkurt, C. (2011). Bilgi Yönetimi Pazar Odaklılık ve Pazarlama Yeniliği İlişkisi: Mobilya Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 31-69.
  26. F‐Jardón, C. M. ve Martos, M. S. (2009). Intellectual capital and performance in wood industries of Argentina. Journal of intellectual capital, 10(4), 600-616.
  27. Gençtürk, F. E., Kandemir, D., Koç, Ö. T. ve Demirci, I. C. (2010). Rekabet avantajı kuramının tanımlanması ve ölçümlenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 9(34), 13-25.
  28. George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th Baskı). New York: Routledge.
  29. Gogan, L. M., Artene, A., Sarca, I. ve Draghici, A. (2016). The impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221(0), 194-202.
  30. Görmüş, A. Ş. (2009). Entelektüel sermaye ve insan kaynakları yönetiminin artan önemi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 57-75.
  31. Güçlü, H. (2014). Entelektüel Sermayenin Temel Finansal Tablolar Aracılığıyla Sunulması.
  32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. In (7th Edition ed.). Uppersaddle River,NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  33. Hamadamin, H. H. ve Atan, T. (2019). The impact of strategic human resource management practices on competitive advantage sustainability: The mediation of human capital development and employee commitment. Sustainability, 11(20), 5782.
  34. Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R. M. ve Sánchez-Medina, A. (2011). The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 71-92.
  35. Hsu, L. C. ve Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: the mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179-205.
  36. İpçioğlu, İ. ve Şahin, F. (2012). Örgüt kültürü ve entelektüel sermaye ilişkisinin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 153-165.
  37. İraz, R. (2005). İşletmelerde bilgi yönetiminin yenilik ve rekabet gücü üzerindeki etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 243-258.
  38. Jardon, C. M. ve Martos, M. S. (2012). Intellectual capital as competitive advantage in emerging clusters in Latin America. Journal of intellectual capital, 13(4), 462-481.
  39. Jurczak, J. (2008). Intellectual capital measurement methods. Economics and organization of enterprise, 1(1), 37-45.
  40. Kamukama, N., Ahiauzu, A. ve Ntayi, J. M. (2011). Competitive advantage: mediator of intellectual capital and performance. Journal of intellectual capital, 12(1), 152-164.
  41. Kamukama, N. ve Sulait, T. (2017). Intellectual capital and competitive advantage in Uganda’s microfinance industry. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 8(4), 498-514.
  42. Kandemir, T. (2008). Entellektüel Sermaye Kavramı ve Tarihsel Gelişimi. In P. D. R. AŞIKOĞLU (Ed.), Entelektüel sermaye : Kuram gelişim ve yeni perspektifler (pp. 23-36).
  43. Kanıbir, H. (2004). Yeni bir rekabet gücü kaynağı olarak entellektüel sermaye ve organizasyonel performansa yansımaları. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 1(3), 77-85.
  44. Karakuş, M. ve Çobanoğlu, N. (2013). İlkokullarda entelektüel sermayenin ölçülmesi ve bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2013(16).
  45. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Kavramlar, teknikler ve ilkeler (27. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  46. Kaya, S. (2017). İşletmelerde entelektüel sermaye ve bilgi yönetiminin inovasyon performansı ve rekabet avantajı üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. (Doktora Tezi). Haliç Üniversitesi İstanbul.
  47. Kerimov, R. (2011). Entelektüel sermayenin ölçülmesi, raporlanması ve işletme performansına etkisi: Örnek bir uygulama. (Yüksek Lisans). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  48. Keskin, H., Kalaycıoğlu, O. ve İnce, H. (2017). İhracat yetenekleri ve rekabet avantajı ilişkisi: Türk ihracatçı firmaları üzerine uygulamalı bir araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 18, 51-68.
  49. Khalique, M., Bontis, N., Abdul Nassir bin Shaari, J. ve Hassan Md. Isa, A. (2015). Intellectual capital in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. Journal of intellectual capital, 16(1), 224-238.
  50. Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.-C. ve Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of intellectual capital, 15(3), 362-375.
  51. Kocapınar, E. B. (2010). Entelektüel Sermayenin Girişimsel Oryantasyona Etkisi ve Firma Performansı ile İlişkisi. (Doktora Tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Gebze.
  52. Koç, M. ve Özbozkurt, O. B. (2014). Ulusların rekabet üstünlüğü ve elmas modeli üzerine bir değerlendirme. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 85-91.
  53. Kong, E. ve Prior, D. (2008). An intellectual capital perspective of competitive advantage in nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(2), 119-128.
  54. Kurgun, O. ve Akdağ, G. (2013). Entelektüel sermaye ve örgüt performansı ilişkisi: Akdeniz bölgesindeki otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 2(2), 155-176.
  55. Kutlu, H. A. (2009). Entellektüel Sermaye: Türkiye Muhasebe Sisteminde Raporlanabilir mi? Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 235-257.
  56. Li, D.-y. ve Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.
  57. Longo, M. ve Mura, M. (2015). A methodology for measuring intellectual capital. A structural equations modelling approach. In M. Sharma (Ed.), Advances in Measurement Systems. Croatia: In-Tech.
  58. Malkawi, N. M., Al Omari, K. ve Halasa, A. (2018). Intellectual Capital as a Core Competency for Competitive Advantage: A Case Study. Journal of Digital Information Management, 16(4), 192-202.
  59. Mardia, K. (1985). Mardia's Test of Multinormality (Vol. 5). New York: Wiley.
  60. Marr, B. ve Moustaghfir, K. (2005). Defining intellectual capital: a three-dimensional approach. Management Decision, 43(9), 1114-1128.
  61. Menguc, B. ve Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 34(1), 63-73.
  62. Mondal, A. (2016). Application of Modified VAICTM Model for Measuring Intellectual Capital Performance. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 6(11), 19-30.
  63. Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H. T. ve Bukh, P. N. (2001). Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, organizations and society, 26(7-8), 735-762.
  64. Naktiyok, A. ve Karabey, C. N. (2007). İşletmelerin maddi olmayan kaynakları ve çevresel olumsuzluk algıları ile stratejik yönelimleri arasındaki ilişki. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal BF Dergisi, 62(4), 203-225.
  65. Nazari, J. A., Herremans, I. M., Isaac, R. G., Manassian, A. ve Kline, T. J. (2011). Organizational culture, climate and IC: an interaction analysis. Journal of intellectual capital, 12(2), 224-248.
  66. Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 29(7), 745-768.
  67. Nonaka, I. ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford university press.
  68. Nzewi, H. N., Robert, E. I., Ifechi, A. N., Monene, C. P. ve Martin, O. (2019). Intellectual capital and competitive advantage of selected commercial banks in Anambra State. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 6(5), 27-36.
  69. Okay, S. (2012). Entelektüel sermaye ve muhasebe ile ilişkisi. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 1201-1208.
  70. Ozkan, N., Cakan, S. ve Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190-198.
  71. Özdemir, B. ve Taşcı, D. (2017). Entelektüel sermaye ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin testi: Türkiye’nin ilk 1000 sanayi kuruluşu’nda ampirik bir araştırma. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies(61), 363-372.
  72. Özevren, M. ve Yıldız, S. (2010). Entelektüel sermayenin ölçüm yöntemleri ve kriterlerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2), 275-289.
  73. Pazarceviren, S. Y. ve Kaya, H. P. (2018). Entelektüel sermayeyi hesaplanmış maddi olmayan değer yöntemi ile ölçme ve raporlama. Business and Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 331-348.
  74. Petty, R. ve Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management. Journal of intellectual capital, 1(2), 155-176.
  75. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance: with a new introduction. New York: Free Press.
  76. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.
  77. Rastogi, P. (2003). The nature and role of IC: Rethinking the process of value creation and sustained enterprise growth. Journal of intellectual capital, 4(2), 227-248.
  78. Rossi, C., Cricelli, L., Grimaldi, M. ve Greco, M. (2016). The strategic assessment of intellectual capital assets: An application within Terradue Srl. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1598-1603.
  79. Sağlam, M. (2020). Öğrenen örgüt anlayışının ve entelektüel sermayenin, örgütsel ustalık ve örgütlerin girişimcilik yönelimi üzerindeki etkisi: Hizmet ve üretim sektörü yönetici algılarının karşılaştırmalı analizi. (Doktora tezi). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  80. Serenko, A. ve Bontis, N. (2004). Meta‐review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and process management, 11(3), 185-198.
  81. Shih, K.-H., Chang, C.-J. ve Lin, B. (2010). Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry. Journal of intellectual capital, 11(1), 74-89.
  82. Sönmez, R. ve Kasımoğlu, M. (2014). Sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajının kaynağı: endüstri temelli teori ve kaynak temelli teori çerçevesinde. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(25), 63-90.
  83. Stewart, T. A. (1991). Brainpower. Fortune 123, 11, 44-54.
  84. Stonehouse, G. ve Snowdon, B. (2007). Competitive advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 256-273.
  85. Subramaniam, M. ve Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of management journal, 48(3), 450-463.
  86. Sumedrea, S. (2013). Intellectual capital and firm performance: A dynamic relationship in crisis time. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 137-144.
  87. Taie, E. S. (2014). The effect of intellectual capital management on organizational competitive advantage in Egyptian hospitals. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(2), 160-167.
  88. Tekin, M. ve Çiçek, E. (2005). İşletmelerde rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamada farklı bir yaklaşım: Değer temelli pazarlama. Paper presented at the V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
  89. Todericiu, R. ve Stăniţ, A. (2015). Intellectual capital–The key for sustainable competitive advantage for the SME's sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, 676-681.
  90. Tovstiga, G. ve Tulugurova, E. (2009). Intellectual capital practices: a four‐region comparative study. Journal of intellectual capital, 10(1), 70-80. doi:10.1108/14691930910922905
  91. Tunçer, A. ve Tarlacı, Ö. A. (2020). Entelektüel sermaye ve işletme performansı ilişkisinde, yenileşimi destekleyen örgüt ikliminin rolü. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 156-180.
  92. Türkkan, E. (2001). Rekabet teorisi ve endüstri iktisadı. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.
  93. Urbancova, H. (2013). Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of competitiveness, 5(1), 82-96.
  94. Ülgen, H. ve Mirze, S. K. (2013). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  95. Vătămănescu, E.-M., Gorgos, E.-A., Ghigiu, A. M. ve Pătruț, M. (2019). Bridging intellectual capital and SMEs internationalization through the lens of sustainable competitive advantage: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 11(9), 1-22.
  96. Wang, W. Y. ve Chang, C. (2005). Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan. Journal of intellectual capital, 6(2), 222-236.
  97. Williams, R. L. ve Bukowitz, W. R. (2001). The yin and yang of intellectual capital management: The impact of ownership on realizing value from intellectual capital. Journal of intellectual capital, 2(2), 96-110.
  98. Yaseen, S. G., Dajani, D. ve Hasan, Y. (2016). The impact of intellectual capital on the competitive advantage: Applied study in Jordanian telecommunication companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 168-175.
  99. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(Özel Sayı), 74-85.
  100. Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M. ve Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management studies, 41(2), 335-361.
  101. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K. ve Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of marketing, 69(2), 42-60.