Cilt 8 Sayı 3 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

ÇEVRE YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARININ ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANSLA İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA: ÇEVRESEL PROAKTİFLİĞİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ

PDF
  • Özlem AYAZ ARDA,
  • Tuğçe ASLAN
Özlem AYAZ ARDA
Öğr. Üyesi, Brunel Universitesi
Tuğçe ASLAN
Öğr. Üyesi, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1516

Yayınlanmış 2020-09-25

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Environmental Management Practices Organizational Performance Dynamic Capabilities View Environmental Proactivity
  • Çevre Yönetimi Uygulamaları, Örgütsel Performans, Dinamik Yetenekler Kuramı, Çevresel Proaktiflik

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

AYAZ ARDA, Özlem, & ASLAN, T. (2020). ÇEVRE YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARININ ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANSLA İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA: ÇEVRESEL PROAKTİFLİĞİN ARACILIK ETKİSİ. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 3582–3614. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1516

Özet

Çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının temel boyutlarının ve öncülerinin araştırılması, artan bir araştırma ilgisini hak etmektedir. Kuramsal açıdan dinamik yetenekler kuramının argümanlarını değerlendiren bu çalışmanın inceleme alanlarından biri çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının çevresel proaktiflik üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Buna ek olarak, araştırma, çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının benimsenmesi ile örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkide çevresel proaktifliğin aracılık rolünü araştırmaktadır. Örneklemini çeşitli sektörlerden 208 Türk firmasının oluşturduğu araştırmanın sonuçları, çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının çevresel proaktifliği olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının örgütsel performans üzerindeki etkisinin çevresel proaktiflik ile anlam ve önem kazandığı görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte çevresel proaktiflik ve örgütsel performans arasında da olumlu bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Başka bir deyişle, çevresel proaktifliğin çevre yönetimi uygulamaları ile örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkide tam aracılık etkisi gözlemlenmiştir.                                

PDF

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
  2. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-Lopez, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 357-381.
  3. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
  4. Arda, O. A., Bayraktar, E., & Tatoglu, E. (2019). How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 64-78.
  5. Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
  6. Banerjee, A. (1998). Environment, population, and human settlements of Sundarban Delta. Concept Publishing Company.
  7. Banerjee, S.B. (2001). Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 489-513.
  8. Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., &Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106-122.
  9. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10,1, 7-45.
  10. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  11. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17 (1), 99–120.
  12. Berchicci, L., Dowell, G., & King, A. A. (2012). Environmental capabilities and corporate strategy: Exploring acquisitions among US manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1053-1071.
  13. Boyd, B.K. (1991). Strategic planning and financial performance: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Management Studies, 28(4), 353-374.
  14. Buckley, M.R., Cote, J.A., & Comstock, S.M. (1990). Measurement errors in behavioral sciences: The case of personality/attitude research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(3), 447-474.
  15. Cairncross, F. (1992). How Europe’s companies reposition to recycle. Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 34-42.
  16. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 663-680.
  17. Claver, E., Lopez, M. D., Molina, J. F., &Tarí, J. J. (2007). Environmental management and firm performance: A case study. Journal of environmental Management, 84(4), 606-619.
  18. Cordeiro, J. J., and Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment. 6(2) 104-114.
  19. Curkovic, S., Melynk, S.A., Handfield, R.B., &Calantone, R.J. (2000). Investigating the linkage between total quality management and environmentally responsible manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(4), 444-446.
  20. Dess, G.G., & Robinson, R.B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
  21. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
  22. Ervin, D., Wu, J.J., Khanna, M., Jones, C., &Wirkkala, T. (2013). Motivations and barriers to corporate environmental management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 390-409.
  23. Fernández, E., Junquera, B., &Ordiz, M. (2003). Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(4), 634-656.
  24. Fornell, C., &Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  25. Ganster, D.C., Hennessey, H.W., &Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321-331.
  26. Ginsberg, J.M., Bloom P.N., (2004). Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review. 48(1) 79-85
  27. Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega, 33, 1-15.
  28. Gökşen, N. S., &Üsdiken, B. (2001). Uniformity and diversity in Turkish business groups: Effects of scale and time of founding. British Journal of Management, 12(4), 325-340.
  29. Greene, C.N., & Organ, D.W. (1973). An evaluation of causal models linking the received role with job satisfaction. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 95-103.
  30. Groenewegen, P., &Vergragt, P. (1991). Environmental issues as threats and opportunities for technological innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(1), 43-55.
  31. Gunduz, L., &Tatoglu, E. (2003). A comparison of the financial characteristics of group affiliated and independent firms in Turkey. European Business Review, 15(1), 48-54.
  32. Hanna, M. D., & Rocky Newman, W. (1995). Operations and environment: an expanded focus for TQM. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(5), 38-53.
  33. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis – A Global Perspective, 7th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  34. Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of environmental economics and management, 28(1), 98-113.
  35. Harrison, D.A., McLaughlin, M.E., & Coalter, T.M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 246-261.
  36. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
  37. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
  38. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
  39. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 67(3), 451-470.
  40. Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., et al. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  41. Henriques, I., &Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
  42. Hofer, C., D. E. Cantor, and J. Dai. 2012. The Competitive Determinants of a Firm’s Environmental Management Activities: Evidence from US Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Operations Management 30: 69–84.
  43. Hufnagel, E. M., & Conca, C. (1994). User response data: The potential for errors and biases.
  44. Glaister, K. W., Dincer, O., Tatoglu, E., &Demirbag, M. (2009). A comparison of strategic planning practices in companies from the UK and Turkey. Journal of Management Development, 28(4), 361-379. Information Systems Research, 5(1), 48-73.
  45. Janssens, W., Wijnen, K., De Pelsmacker, P., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Marketing Research with SPSS. Pearson Education Limited, England.
  46. Jennings, P. D., &Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of management review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
  47. Kamande, M. W., &Lokina, R. B. (2013). Clean production and profitability: An eco-efficiency analysis of kenyan manufacturing firms. The Journal of Environment & Development, 22(2), 169-185.
  48. Kemp, R. (1993). An economic analysis of cleaner technologies: theory and evidence. In: Fischer, K., Schot, J. (Eds.), Environmental Strategies for Industry. Island Press, Washington, pp. 79–113.
  49. Khanna, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). Corporate environmental management and environmental efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 50(2), 227-242.
  50. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105-116.
  51. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance?.The review of economics and statistics, 83(2), 281-289.
  52. Klassen, R. D. (2001). Plant‐level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 257-275.
  53. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
  54. Lewin, A. Y., & Minton, J. W. (1986). Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management science, 32(5), 514-538.
  55. Li, Y.H., Huang, J.W., & Tsai, M.T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440-449.
  56. López-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorín, J. F., &Claver-Cortes, E. (2009). The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3110-3121.
  57. López-Gamero, M.D, Molina-Azorín, J.F., &Claver-Cortes, E. (2011). The relationship between managers’ environmental perceptions, environmental management and firm performance in Spanish hotels: A whole framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13, 141-163.
  58. Malhotra, N.K., Kim S.S., &Patil A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
  59. Malhotra, N.K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. 6th Edition, Pearson, New York.
  60. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
  61. McGee, E.C., &Bhushan, A.K. (1993). Applying the Baldrige quality criteria to environmental performance: Lessons from leading organizations. Total Quality Environmental Management, 3(1), 1-18.
  62. Melynk, S.A., Sroufe, R., &Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329-351
  63. Molina-Azorin, J.F., Tari, J.J., Claver-Cortes, E., & Lopez-Gamero, M.D. (2009). Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: A review of empirical studies and issues of integration, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 197-222.
  64. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., &Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998-1014.
  65. Nash, M. (1983). Managing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  66. Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535-547.
  67. Nishitani, K., Kaneko, S., Fujii, H., & Komatsu, S. (2011). Effects of the reduction of pollution emissions on the economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis focusing on demand and productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(17), 1956-1964.
  68. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  69. Organ, D.W., & Greene, C.N. (1981). The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 237-252.
  70. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., &Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
  71. Pearce, J.A., Freeman, E.B., & Robinson, R.B. (1987). The tenuous link between formal strategic planning and financial performance. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 658-675.
  72. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., &Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  73. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal. 12 (2), 95-117.
  74. Porter, M. E., and Van der Linde, C. (1995a). “Green and competitive”. Harvard Business Review, 73 (5), pp. 120-134.
  75. Porter, M. E., and Van der Linde, C. (1995b). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The journal of economic perspectives. 9 (4), 97-118.
  76. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods. 40(3), 879-891.
  77. Rao, M.P. (2006). A performance measurement system using a profit-linked multi-factor measurement model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(3), 362-379.
  78. Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., &Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods. 12(4), 762-800.
  79. Russo, M.V., &Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal. 40(3), 534-559.
  80. Sarkis, J. (1998). Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 159-174.
  81. Sharma, S., &Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729-753.
  82. Schriesheim, C.A. (1979). The similarity of individual-directed and group directed leader behavior descriptions. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 345-355.
  83. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 183-200.
  84. SME User Guide (2016). User Guide to the SME Definition. European Commission, Brussels: Enterprise and Industry Publications.
  85. Soo Wee, Y., &Quazi, H. A. (2005). Development and validation of critical factors of environmental management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(1), 96-114.
  86. Steger, U. (Ed.). 2004. The business of sustainability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  87. Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies. 45(1), 8-37.
  88. Thornton, D., Kagan, R. A., &Gunningham, N. (2003). Sources of corporate environmental performance. California Management Review, 46(1), 127-141.
  89. Trung D.N., Kumar S. (2005). Resource use and waste management in Vietman hotel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 13, 109–16.
  90. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14, 423-444.
  91. Venkatraman, N., &Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
  92. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 303-319.
  93. Wever, H., &Vorhauer, G.F. (1993). Kodak’s framework and assessment tool for implementing TQEM. Total Quality Environmental Management, 3(1), 19-30.
  94. Williams, L.J., Edwards, J.R., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-936.
  95. Williams, H. E., Medhurst, J., and Drew, K. (1993). Corporate strategies for a sustainable future in Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications (K. Fischer and J. Schot, Eds.).
  96. Yamak, S., &Üsdiken, B. (2006). Economic liberalization and the antecedents of top management teams: evidence from Turkish ‘big’business. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 177-194.
  97. Yu, W., &Ramanathan, R. (2015). An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6390-6407.
  98. Yu, W., &Ramanathan, R. (2016). Environmental management practices and environmental performance: The roles of operations and marketing capabilities. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(6), 1201-1222.
  99. Zhang, H., & Yang, F. (2016). On the drivers and performance outcomes of green practices adoption: an empirical study in China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 2011-2034.