Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Published: 2020-03-25


Doct. Student, Yıldız Teknik University
Prof. Dr., Yıldız Teknik University
SVOD, Piracy, Netflix, Cinema, Movie


The consumption of the content produced in the entertainment industry have been effected by the growing number of internet users and the spread of cloud technologies. Thanks to the video content of brands like Netflix, many users preferred subscription based video on demand (SVOD) services over the television and the cinema. The number of users that accessed pirated movies and series have decreased due to the SVOD services which are estimated to have more than 1.5 million users. Our research examines, paid watching motivations through SVOD services, where consumers reach the content via streaming or offline by paying monthly subsciption fees. Content analysis was carried out by looking over focus group interviews, therefore, answers to factors affecting the intention of using SVOD services were sought. Consumers’ usage motivations for SVODs were examined under 5 major themes which are perceived content quality, effort expectation, price perception, hedonic consumption and perceived usefullness.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  2. Arsel, Z., & Bean, J. (2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 899–917.
  3. Baabdullah, A. M. (2018). Consumer adoption of Mobile Social Network Games (M-SNGs) in Saudi Arabia: The role of social influence, hedonic motivation and trust. Technology in Society, 53, 91–102.
  4. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  6. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005, September). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems.
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  8. De Wulf, K., Schillewaert, N., Muylle, S., & Rangarajan, D. (2006). The role of pleasure in web site success. Information and Management, 43(4), 434–446.
  9. Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding Media Economics. London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi:10.4135/9781446279960
  10. IFPI. (2017). Global music report: Annual state of the industry. International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, 1–44. Retrieved from
  11. Iordanova, D., & Cunningham, S. (2012). Digital disruption : cinema moves on-line. St Andrews Scotland: St Andrews Film Studies. Retrieved from
  12. Jung, Y., Perez-Mira, B., & Wiley-Patton, S. (2009). Consumer adoption of mobile TV: Examining psychological flow and media content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 123–129.
  13. Kos Koklic, M., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Vida, I. (2016). Three-level mechanism of consumer digital piracy: Development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 15–27.
  14. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Analyzing Focus Group Results 6. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 137–161. Retrieved from
  15. Liamputtong, P. (2015). Focus Group Methodology: Introduction and History. In Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice (pp. 1–14). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  16. Lim, M. K. (2018). Philippine Cinema: and the Cultural Economy of Distribution. Cham Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Magaudda, P. (2011). When materiality ‘bites back’: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 15–36.
  18. Mardon, R., & Belk, R. (2018). Materializing digital collecting: An extended view of digital materiality. Marketing Theory, 18(4), 543–570.
  19. McDaniel, L. (2016). “Come TV With Us”: The Business Strategies, Discourses, and Imagined Audiences of Netflix and Hulu. The University of Texas, Texas.
  20. McQuire, S. (2000). Impact aesthetics: Back to the future in digital cinema? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 6(2), 41–61.
  21. Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., Bosangit, C., Ferreira, C., & McGrath, M. (2017). Understanding ethical luxury consumption through practice theories: A study of fine jewellery purchases. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 525–543.
  22. Pardo, A. (2015). From the big screen to the small ones: How digitization is transforming the distribution, exhibition and consumption of movies. Besides the Screen: Moving Images Through Distribution, Promotion and Curation, 23–45.
  23. Parmaksız, M. Y., & Enginkaya, E. (2019). SVOD markalarinin Twitter üzerindeki iletişimleri: Netflix’ten Blutv’ye. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(4).
  24. Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988). The constitution of society. Social Forces, 66(4), 1124.
  25. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
  26. Richardson, C. (2014). ON-DEMAND CULTURE: Digital delivery and the future of movies by chuck tryon. American Studies, 53(3), 115–116.
  27. Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice — New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2490–2497.
  28. Sahni, S. P., Gupta, I., Sahni, S. P., & Gupta, I. (2019). Role of self-efficacy and ability towards the act of digital piracy. In Piracy in the Digital Era (pp. 129–142). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  29. Schatzki, T. R. (2013). Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Choice Reviews Online, 34(07), 34-3809-34–3809.
  30. Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51.
  31. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
  32. Sinclair, G., & Tinson, J. (2017). Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption. Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.
  33. Tritter, J. Q., & Landstad, B. J. (2020). Focus Groups. Qualitative Research in Health Care, Fourth Edition, (4), 1–16.
  34. Vanattenhoven, J., & Geerts, D. (2015). Broadcast, Video-on-Demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content, Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, pp. 73–82.
  35. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  36. Warde, A. (2014). After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 279–303.
  37. Watkins, R. (2015). Conceptualising the Ontology of Digital Consumption Objects, 43, 275–281. Retrieved from
  38. Yoon, C. (2011). Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: An integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 405–417.
  39. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A Means-End Model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

How to Cite

PARMAKSIZ, M. Y., & KIRÇOVA, İbrahim. (2020). A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON SUBSCRIPTION BASED WATCHING MOTIVATIONS OF MOVIES AND SERIES: WHY SVOD?. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 779-802.