In recent years, mobile phones are turned into smart phones that is known multimedia machine from interpersonal device.These devices known smartphones are programmable mobile phones that offer advanced talent and features to consumers in their personal and business lives.In rapidly changing mobile phone market, new generation smart phone producers incline consumers with also being under the sway of social influence to buy and use this new technology .It has an important to establish smart phones offered as multi functional devices with different features in terms of which criteria of them are prefered and which features whether used or not by their consumers. The purpose of this paper is to assess smartphones in terms of their users. As a result of literature review, smartphones assesment criterias that are social needs, social influences,convenience,dependency and purchase behaviour are surveyed .200 smartphone users live in the city centre of Kastamonu are surveyed in this study. Results via frequency analysis,Stage Ranking Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the consumers’ smartphone preference reasons,usage and dependendency level.Factors in the literature are confirmed by the confirmatory analysis. Results via MANOVA analysis reveal that there are differences between smartphone users consideration in terms of their demographic features.
- Ada,S. ve Tatlı,H. (2012), “ Akıllı Telefon Kullanımını Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma” K.Maraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F., İşletme Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş
- Bao, P., Pierce, J., Whittaker, S., Zhai, S., “Smart Phone Use by Non-Mobile Business Users”, MobileHCI 2011, Stockholm, Sweden, August 30–September 2, (2011).
- Bodker, M., Gimpel, G. and Hedman, J. (2009), ‘‘Technology use as consumption: a longitudinal study of smart phones’’, Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, Vol. 88, pp. 1-7.
- Campbell, S.W. (2007), ‘‘A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony’’,
- New Medoa Society, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 343-63.
- Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Chen, K. “The Acceptance And Diffusion of The Innovative Smart Phone Use: A Case Study of a Delivery Service Company in Logistics”, Information & Management, 46: 241–248, (2009).
- Hjorthol, R.J. (2008), ‘‘The mobile phone as a tool in family life: impact on planning of everyday activities and car use’’, Transport Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 303-20.
- Hundley, H.L. and Shyles, L. (2010), ‘‘US teenagers’ perceptions and awareness of digital technology: a focus group approach’’, New Media Society, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 417-33.
- Kang, Y. M., Cho., C., Lee, S., “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Smartphones”, IEEE International Technology Management Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, (2011).
- Kim, S.H. (2008), ‘‘Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: adoption of a smartphone by individuals’’, Information and Management, Vol. 45, pp. 387-93.
- Klobas, J.E. and Clyde, L.A. (2001), ‘‘Social influence and internet use’’, Library Management, Vol. 22
- No. 1, pp. 61-7.
- Lane, W., Manner, C., “The Impact of Personality Traits on Smartphone Ownership and Use”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 17 , 22-28, (2011).
- Mangleburg, T.F. and Bristol, T. (1998), ‘‘Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising’’, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 27 No. 3.
- Park, Y. and Chen, J.V. (2007), ‘‘Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone’’, Industrial Management and Data, Vol. 107 No. 9, pp. 1349-65.
- Ting,D., Lim,S., Patanmacia,T., Low,C. and Ker,G. (2011),"Dependency on smartphone and the impact on purchase behaviour", Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, Vol. 12 Iss: 3 pp. 193 – 203
- Wajcman, J., Bittman, M. and Brown, J.E. (2008), ‘‘Families without borders: mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions’’, Sociology, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 635-52.
- Wilson, S. and McCarthy, G. (2010), ‘‘The mobile university: from library to the campus’’, Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1-39.