Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN TERMS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

Belgin BAHAR
Assist. Dr., Galatasaray University

Published 2019-09-20

Keywords

  • Organizational justice,
  • interactional justice,
  • distributive justice,
  • procedural justice,
  • performance
  • Örgütsel adalet,
  • etkileşim adaleti,
  • dağıtım adaleti,
  • süreç adaleti,
  • performans

How to Cite

BAHAR, B. (2019). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN TERMS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1260-1274. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i4.1159

Abstract

Organizational justice is an important concept that affects employee attitudes and behaviors. However, there are few studies examining the relationship between organizational justice and employee performance in the literature. The aim of this research is to provide a better understanding of the concept of organizational justice and to examine the relationship between employee perceptions of interaction justice and employee performance. This study was conducted with the participation of 183 employees in the banking sector in Istanbul. The concepts in question were first examined on the basis of demographic factors, then the relationship between them was analyzed. According to the research results, positive relationships between employees and perception of justice are among the factors that determine performance. However, demographic differences have no impact on the perception of interactional justice and performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963), “Towards an understanding of inequity”. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67.5: 422.
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965), Inequity in social Exchange. In: Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, 267-299.
  3. Aktaş, H. ve Şimşek, E. (2014), “Örgütsel Sessizlik ile Algılanan Bireysel Performans, Örgüt Kültürü ve Demografik Değişkenler Arasındaki Etkileşim”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14.28: 24-52.
  4. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Begley, T. M. (2003), “The employment relationships of foreign workers versus local employees: A field study of organizational justice, job satisfaction, performance, and OCB”. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24.5: 561-583.
  5. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X. Budhwar, P. S. (2004), “Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice”. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 94.1: 1-14.
  6. Aydın, A., Üçüncü, K., Taşdemir, T. (2004), “İşletmelerde Uygulanan Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Çalısmalarının Çalısan Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 5.
  7. Benligiray, S. Ve Geylan, R. (2004), İnsan kaynakları yönetimi. Eskişehir, Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  8. Beugre, C. D., & Baron, R. A. (2001). “Perceptions of systemic justice: The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 324-339.
  9. Bies, R. J., Moag, J. S. ;(1986), “Interactional communication criteria of fairness”. Research in organizational behavior, 9: 289-319.
  10. Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. M. (1993), Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
  11. Campbell, J. P. (1990), Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 687-732. Palo Alto, CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  12. Cobb, A. T., Frey, F. M. (1996), “The Effects of Leader Fairness and Pay Outcomes on Superior/Subordinate Relations” 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26.16: 1401-1426.
  13. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon. D. E., Wesson, M.J. Porter C.O & Ng, K.Y. (2001), “Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research”. Journal of applied psychology, 86.3: 425.
  14. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological review, 83(2), 85.
  15. Çöl, G. (2011). “Algılanan güçlendirmenin iş gören performansı üzerine etkileri”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
  16. Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., Munson, L. J. (1998), “The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace”. Journal of Applied psychology, 83.5: 683.
  17. Greenberg, J. (1987). “A taxonomy of organizational justice theories”. Academy of Management review, 12(1), 9-22.
  18. Greenberg, J. (1990), “Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow”. Journal of management, 16.2: 399-432.
  19. İçerli, L. (2010), “Örgütsel adalet: kuramsal bir yaklaşım”. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi (5:1), 67-92.
  20. İyigün, N. Ö. (2012). Örgütsel adalet: Kuramsal bir yaklaşım. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Yıl: 11 Sayı: 21 Bahar 2012 / 1 s.49-64
  21. Leventhal, G. S.; Karuza, J.; Fry, W. R. (1980), “Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences”. Justice and social interaction, 3.1: 167-218.
  22. Özer, P. S., & Urtekin, A. G. G. E. (2007). “Örgütsel adalet algısı boyutları ve iş doyumu ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma”. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 107-125.
  23. Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, M. C. (2000), “Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment”. Journal of quality management, 5(1), 27-52.
  24. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  25. Tetik, S. (2012), “Kamu işletmelerinde çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılarının bazı demografik özellikler açısından incelenmesi”. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4.1: 239-249.
  26. Thibaut, J. W., Walker, L. (1975), Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.
  27. Wasti, S. A. (2001), “Örgütsel adalet kavramı ve tercüme bir ölçeğin Türkçe'de güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi”. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1: 33-50.
  28. Yelboğa, A. (2012), “Örgütsel adalet ile iş doyumu ilişkisi: Ampirik bir çalışma”. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 12.2: 171-182.