Broom, M.G. (1977). Coorientational measurement of public issues, Public Relations Review, 3(4), 110-119.
Broom, G. M., Casey, S. & Ritchey, J. (2000). Concept and theory of organizationpublic relationships. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 3-22), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cameron, G. T. (1997). The contingency theory of conflict management in public relations. In Proceedings of the Norwegian Information Service, Oslo, Norway.
Canary, D. J. & Zelley, E. D. (2000). Current Research Programs on Relational Maintenance Behaviors, In M.E. Roloff ve G.D.Paulson (Eds), Communication Yearbook 23, pp.305-340. Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Canary, D.J. & Stafford, L. (1993). Preservation of Relational Characteristics: Maintenance Strategies, Equity, And Locus of Control, in Kalbfleisch, P.J. (Ed.), Interpersonal Communication: Evolving Interpersonal Relationships, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Canary, D.J. & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining Relationships Through Strategic And Routine Interaction, in Canary, D.J. & Stafford, L. (Eds), Communication and Relational Maintenance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Coyne, I.T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, (26), 623-630.
Donio, J, (2006). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in a digital environment: An empirical test. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(7), 445-557.
Ferguson, M. A. (1984). Building theory in public relations: Inter-organizational relationships. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division, at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL, August.
Grunig, J. E. & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gabarro, J. J. (1978), The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A.G. Athos & J.J. Gabarro (eds.), Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and Understanding in Relationships. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, , pp.290–303.
Hon, L.C. & Grunig, J.E. (1999). Measuring Relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
Huang, Y. H. (1997). Public relations strategies, relational outcomes, and conflict management strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Huang, Y. H. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization–public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 61–90.
Hung, (2005) Exploring types of organizational-public relationships and their implications for relationship management in public relations, Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(4), 393-426.
Hung, C. J. F. (2002). The interplays of relationship types, relationship cultivation, and relationship outcomes: How multinational and Taiwanese companies practice public relations and organization-public relationship management in China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Ki, J.E & Hon C.L. (2006). Relationship maintenance strategies on Fortune 500 company web sites, Journal of Communication Management, 10(1), pp. 27-43.
Ki, J.E. & Hon C.L. (2008). A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21 (1), 1-24.
Lee, J. & Feick, L. (2001). The impact of switching costs on the customer satisfactionloyalty link: mobile phone service in France. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 35-48.
Liu, Z. Q. (2012). Effects of message interactivity upon relational maintenance strategy in digital communications between organizations and the public. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Presented to The College of Graduate and Professional Studies PhD in Technology Management Program Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana.
McCracken, G. (1988). The Long Interview, Sage, Newbury Park, CA
O’Hair, D., Friedrich, G.W., Wiemann, J.M. & Wiemann, M.O (1995). Component Communication, New York: St.Martin’s Press.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York.
Shoemaker, S. & Lewis, C.R. (1999). Customer loyalty: the future of hospitality marketing. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18(4), 345-370.
Stafford, L. & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217-242.
Sungun, Y. (2005). The effects of organization-public relationships on organizational reputation from the perspective of publics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland: Maryland.
- Abstract viewed - 225 times
- PDF (Türkçe) downloaded - 95 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 2019
Aslı İcil TUNCER
Assist. Prof. Dr., Adnan Menderes University
How to Cite
PUBLIC RELATIONS AS A RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT: ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
Vol 7 No 1 (2019): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Submitted: Mar 19, 2019
Published: Mar 19, 2019
The paradigm of relationship management puts the relations in the center of public relations and public relations are rewarded in terms of this center. Public relations as the management of relations requires the resolution of the structure of relations with stakeholders and the public. This research the forms of the relationship established by the organization, how the relations are perceived in the organization, the strategies used to train these relations and the in-depth interviews to reveal the results of the relationship that the organization expects, tried to solve with focus group studies. When all the findings are generally evaluated, the relations are clearly at the center of the organization, and the relations for the publics are valuable. The results of the relationship that the organization hopes as a result of the strategies in the training of the relations are different in the evaluations of the public.