THE EFFECT OF MINTZBERG’S CLASSIFICATION OF MANAGERIAL ROLES ADOPTED BY MANAGERS, ON HUMAN RESOURCES’ PERCEPTION OF ENDOGENEITY ANS EXOGENEITY STATUS IN SERVICE SECTOR: A SAMPLE APPLICATION

Nilüfer RÜZGAR
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i4.325

Abstract

The integration of human resources with the organization via behavioural approaches, constitutes great importance in the organizations that are active in service sector; because of the fact that the employees are in face-to-face interaction with customers at most of their times. Endogeneity and exogeneity status is one of these approaches. A member who feels belonged to the organization and given important responsibilities; acquires endogeneity status and thus enhance performance. On the other hand, a member who acquires exogeneity status will feel the same interaction in a negative way and thus, organizational efficiency will be affected in a negative way because of the low quality of the service. Along with this, the member of the organization perceives these statuses, in accordance with the adopted and displayed roles by the leader. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to research the effect of managerial roles, which are cathegorized by Mintzberg, adopted by leaders on employees’ perception of endogeneity and exogeneity status. For this purpose, survey method is applied in Yalova branch of Ramada Hotels. The survey consists Sharp’s (1993) Managerial Roles Scale, which aims at classifying managerial roles with 46 items; Perceived Insider Status Scale of 6 items developed by Stamper and Masterson (2002), which aims at measuring the employees’ endogeneity and exogeneity status perception; and demographical questions. A total of 150 surveys are delivered and 108 participants have responded to the surveys. The data gathered is analysed by SPSS 20.0 package programme. The findings show that while the decision-maker and informative roles do not have a statistically meaningful effect on perceived insider status of employees, interpersonnel roles have a decreasing effect on perceived insider status of employees.

Keywords

Organizational Behaviour; Endogeneity; Exogeneity; Managerial Roles; Leadership Roles; Service Sector

Full Text:

PDF (Türkçe)

References

Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organisations. Personnel Management. 16. 28-31.

Aydınlı, H. (2003). Örgüt kültürünün yönetim açısından önemi. Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2. 79-99.

Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Breland, J. W., Treadway, D. C., Duke, A. B. ve Adams, G. L. (2007). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and political skill on subjective carrier success. Journal of Leadership&Organizational Studies. 13(3). 1-14.

Buonocore, F., Metallo C. ve Salvatore, D. (2009). Behavioural consequences of job insecurity and perceived insider status for contingent workers. Papers of System Congress, pp. 1–29, Internet Address: www. oa2009.it/papers/ Buonocore_Metallo_ Salvatore. pdf, Date of Access: 11.07.2011.

Chen, Z. X. ve Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: The cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal. 50(1). pp. 226-238.

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. ve Jacqueline, A-M. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.173

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Shore, L. M., Taylor, M. S. ve Tetrick, L. E. (Eds.). (2004). The employment relationship: examining psychological and contextual perspectives. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.

Davis, R. C. (1951). The fundamentals of top management. New York: Harper

Doğan, M. (1998). İşletme ekonomisi ve yönetimi. Genişletilmiş Yeni Baskı. İzmir: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Eren, E. , (2010). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım. 12.Basım

Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. (Trans. C. Storrs). London: Pitman.

Koçoğlu E. (2010). İşletmelerde yöneticilerin karar verme süreci ve bu süreçte bilişim sistemlerinin kullanımı: Ankara ili örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atılım Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı.

Koontz, H. O'Donnell, C. ve Weihrich, H. (1980). Management: A Book of Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kurgun, O. Ve Akdağ, G. (2013). Entelektüel sermaye ve örgüt performansı ilişkisi: Akdeniz bölgesindeki otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Nevsehir University Journal of Social Sciences 2(2013) 155-176

Lapalme, M. E., Stamper, C., Semard, G. ve Tremblay, M. (2009). “Bringing the Outside in: Can ‘‘external’’ workers experience insider status? Journal of Organizationa lBehavior. 30(9). pp. 919–940.

Özdevecioğlu, M. ve Balcı, F. (2011). Algılanan içsellik statüsünün örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 37. ss.41-64.

Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M. Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., ve Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 20(5), 405-416.

Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row. Management Library: HD 31.M457

Mintzberg, H. (1990). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review. March – April, pp. 49 – 61.

Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum. 30. pp. 337–350

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E. Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H. ve Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management. 37(4). pp. 1–28.

Snyder, N. H. ve Wheelen, T. L. (1981). Managerial roles: Mintzberg and the management process theorists. In K. H. Chung (Ed.). Academy of Management Proceedings, 149-253.

Stamper, C. L., Masterson, S. S. ve Knapp, J. R. (2009). A typology of organizational membership: Understanding different membership relationships through the lens of social exchange. Management and Organization Review. 5(3). pp. 303–328.

Stamper, C. L. ve Masterson, S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behaviory. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 23. pp. 875– 894.

Stassen, M., Armstrong M. ve Schlosser F. (2011). Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 32. pp. 319–344

Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlüğü (TDK).

Wang, L., Chu, X. ve Ni, J. (2010). Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: A new perspective from perceived insider status and Chinese traditionality. Frontiers Business Research China. 4(1). pp. 148–169.

View Counter: Abstract | 0 PDF (Türkçe) - 0

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM